CCMin_93May12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

o~ MINUTES MAY 12, 1993 PAGE 6 side (Coffman) for reconstuction. Mr. Furman's assessment was calculated based on the short side footage, but assessed at the reconstruction rate. Baldwin felt this was consistent with the assessment policy which provides for using the footage for the short side when reconstructing the long side and that the property owner would not be bearing an undue portion of the project cost. Baldwin stated that unless he heard otherwise from council the objection will be denied and passed on to the clerk. Council made no comments. In addition to the Fruman objection the following written objections were also presented. Jack W. Miller 2111 Hoyt Sidewalk replacement unnecessary and too expensive Clinton T. Johnson 2203 Hoyt Sidewalk replacement unnecessary except for one block Martin McCleery 1918 Autumn Descrepancy in front footage on plat map R. B. & Hazel Garcia 1906 Prior Descrepancy in front footage on plat map A written objection from Frederick Cooper and Helen Griebel regarding the assessment charge was addressed during the hearing as Mr. Cooper was in attendance. Some adjustments to the assessment were made. There being no further comments from council, Baldwin declared that all written objections are denied by council and being passed on to the city clerk. The clerk was directed to notify those who submitted written objections of the procedure to be followed if they wish to appeal the assessment. Ciernia moved the approval of Resolution R-93-25 adopting the assessment roll as amended. Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION R-93-25 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT FOR THE 1993 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1993 AUDIT REPORT PRESENTED AND ACCEPTED David Hennenkamp, representing the city's auditing firm, Kern, DeWenter, Viere Ltd., made a brief presentation of the audit