Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes <br />October 26, 1994 <br />Page 2 1. ~ c3 <br />PRESENTATION ON ACTIVITIES OF THE NORTHWEST YOUTH AND FAMILY <br />SERVICE BUREAU <br />Paul Ciernia and Kay Andrews of Northwest Youth and Family Services (NYFS) gave a brief <br />presentation regarding the services provided by their organization. This presentation included <br />statistics as to the number of Falcon Heights residents serviced, funding sources of the <br />organization, and a breakdown of expenditure categories. Ciernia and Andrews stressed to <br />the council the importance of city contributions to the success of NYFS and thanked the <br />council for their on-going financial support. <br />Mayor Baldwin expressed his support of NYFS and noted his disappointment in the fact that <br />the cities of Lauderdale and St. Anthony have chosen not to make a city contribution in 1995. <br />CONSIDERATION OF A POLICY ON SIDEWALK REPAIRS <br />Administrator Hoyt reported on a proposed sidewalk policy for the city. She began by <br />outlining the problem with sidewalk disrepair, which includes sidewalks that have cracks and <br />heaves due to tree roots and settling soil. Sidewalk disrepair has been an on-going problem <br />in the city, especially because of the city's well-established boulevard tree program (boulevard <br />trees inevitably interfere with sidewalk panelsl. When a sidewalk is extremely cracked or <br />raised 1 " or more, it is the responsibility of the city to assure that they are repaired to reduce <br />the safety hazard on the public right-of-way. There are two neighborhoods in the city that <br />have sidewalks and about 40 sidewalk panels that need attention. The city presently <br />maintains public pathways (not technically sidewalks) along Cleveland Avenue, Hamline <br />Avenue north of Larpenteur, and Coffman Street north of Folwell Avenue. <br />Hoyt continued by saying that until 1992, the city practiced a policy of requesting property <br />owners to repair sidewalk panels that were identified by city staff to be in hazardous <br />condition. These repairs were often completed by property owners. However, there was no <br />mechanism to assure that the repairs were completed or that the repairs were made up to city <br />standards for sidewalk materials and surfacing. <br />As a part of the 1993 Grove street project, the city was able to dramatically improve sidewalk <br />safety in the Grove neighborhood. Many of the sidewalks were in disrepair ad were entirely <br />replaced. The cost of the replacement was shared by the city and the abutting property <br />owner. The city covered the removal of the concrete and paid for 12' to 15' (or 2 1 /2 to 3 <br />panels) of 6" concrete slabs for each property. The abutting property owner was assessed <br />for the remainder of the work. The extensive nature of the project reduced the cost <br />considerable, In the areas that the city did not replace the entire sidewalk, the city covered <br />the cost of replacing the hazardous panels the appeared randomly, thereby eliminating the <br />danger. <br />In order to assure that sidewalk maintenance is done in a timely manner, Hoyt and Engineer <br />Maurer reported on three alternatives for sidewalk repair: 1) the property owner does the <br />work and if it isn't completed in 30 days, the city will do it and bill the owner; 2) the city does <br />the work and assesses all or part of the job to the property owner; or 3) the city does the <br />work and pays for it. Hoyt recommended option three, city replacement, as it can be done <br />efficiently, provides more flexibility in replacing deteriorated panels once the job is underway, <br />