Laserfiche WebLink
n <br />~~ <br />1 <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />April 12, 1995 <br />Page 5 <br />1.9 <br />Continuing on, Mr. Long stated that Mr. Wellington is paying much higher taxes <br />than other commercial centers in the area. Any tax savings realized after 1997 <br />would be passed along to tenants in the form of lower rents. Mr. Long admitted <br />that Falcon Crossing is not going "under" but commented that when leases come <br />due, some tenants may be leaving to cheaper rents unless the council takes action <br />to lower the property taxes on this property. The goals of the council and <br />applicant are the same - a healthy business community. <br />Mayor Baldwin stated that the council expects any property owner to attempt to <br />improve their financial situation and they expect that the city will be asked for help. <br />The city, however, has several restrictions on helping in this situation, including a <br />small staff, limited funding, and covenants made with the taxpayers of the city. <br />This project was originally part of an agreement between the developer and the <br />citizens of Falcon Heights that, in return for financial assistance, additional revenue <br />would be generated for the project and development that the city could not <br />otherwise finance. Baldwin noted that the policy issue is that a covenant was <br />made with city taxpayers -the city took on the financing of this project with the <br />promise of a payoff to the public. The council needs to deliver to the public on the <br />$650,000 beyond the initial investment. <br />Baldwin stressed that he does not want to cut off discussions with Mr. Wellington <br />about how to improve his business situation but that in order to terminate the <br />assessment agreement, the applicant will need to find funds not otherwise <br />available to the city to replace the $650,000 lost to TIF revenue. Since the city's <br />legal counsel has stated that the city is legally entitled to enforce the agreement, <br />the city's obligation is to litigate if necessary to avoid termination of the <br />assessment agreement. <br />Councilmember Jacobs asked Mr. Wellington for the meaning of the term "negative <br />economic impact", outside of increased property taxes on the project. <br />The applicant, Mr. Wellington, made several comments in reply. These included <br />that he was not part of the original agreement on the property and that the <br />property taxes on this property are burdensome. Falcon Crossing is not about to <br />"tip over" but some tenants are having problems with their rent levels. Mr. <br />Wellington stated that he would like to see the special assessment approach to <br />public improvements rather than the use of TIF funds and that the amount of <br />proposed improvements might be extreme. Mr. Wellington also noted his <br />dissatisfaction with being asked to pay for the city's consultants in order to <br />continue discussions. <br />Continuing on, Mr. Wellington asserted that the tenant base at Falcon Crossing <br />needs to be solidified and that he would like to be able to compete effectively for <br />quality tenants. The property will always have limitations in attracting new <br />tenants, particularly limitation in parking and vehicular access. Finally, Mr. <br />