Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />MINUTES <br />SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/PUBLIC HEARING <br />SEPTEMBER 5. 1984 <br />PAGE 7 <br />Marvin Kotilinek, 1453 W. Iowa, asked if when Larpenteur or Hoyt are <br />improved the same group would be assessed again, to which Mayor Eggert <br />replied that the costs would be shared by the County and any other <br />municipality bordering on the street. <br />Mayor Eggert closed the public hearing at 10:05 p.m. <br />Council discussed the options in regard to the assessment for Pascal <br />and Albert. Councilmember Ciernia felt there were two options only, <br />to stay with the initial assessment in 1982 or apply the new policy <br />and plan to live with it in the. future. Attorney Van de North advised <br />that to assess under the old system would require another notice and <br />hearing which would delay the matter another year as the assessments <br />must be certified to the County by October 10th. <br />.~: <br />MARVIN <br />KOTILINEK <br />1453 W. IOWA <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />CLOSED 10:05 <br />P.M. <br />ASSESSMENT <br />DISCUSSION <br />Councilmember Baldwin stated that he was attempting to decide which method <br />would be least disruptive to the people, would the average homeowner realize <br />that the law suit would increase the cost, would the average homeowner <br />realize the assessment policy would be applied to a two year old assessment. <br />He felt that at the time of the workshop and Council discussion of the policy <br />it seemed fair, but now he does not feel it is right and would support the <br />1982 roll. Councilmember Ciernia asked if the old or new assessment roll <br />would be more defendable, to which the Attorney responded that market value <br />evidence regarding the old roll would be advisable along with a new notice <br />and hearing, but that it would not be illegal to hold over any assessments <br />for another year. Mayor Eggert asked Council whether they desired to <br />settle the matter immediately or hold it over another year and all agreed <br />they would prefer to make a decision at this time. Councilmember Hard <br />commented on the use of State Aid money for the storm sewer and thought <br />perhaps the cost of the curb and gutter should be spread over the entire <br />area. <br />Mayor Eggert m=ryved, seconded by Councilmember Chestovich, that Resolution 84- <br />31 be adopted.. Upon a vote being taken, the following voted in favor of the <br />motion: Mayc~~ Eggert, Councilmembers Hard, Chestovich, and Ciernia, and the <br />following vot~.~ against the same: Councilmember Baldwin. Motion carried. <br />RESOLUTION 84-31 RESOLUTION <br />84-31 <br />A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE REASSESSMENT ROLL FOR 1982 <br />NORTHOME IMPROVEMENTS, CANCELLING PRIOR ASSESSMENTS, <br />AND DIRECTING REFUNDS. <br /> <br />Mayor Eggert moved, seconded by Councilmember Hard, that the meeting be MEETING <br />extended to allow Bullseye to complete their presentation. Motion EXTENDED <br />carried unanimously. <br />