My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMin_84Oct10
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
198x
>
1984
>
CCMin_84Oct10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 4:49:04 PM
Creation date
6/17/2009 2:31:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />OCTOBER 10, 1984 <br />PAGE 4 <br />Mayor Eggert moved, seconded by Councilmember Chestovich, that a public <br />hearing on tax increment financing for-the Lido Italian Restaurante be <br />scheduled for November 14, 1984 at 8:00 P.M., and that the Clerk Administrator <br />be authorized to publish the same. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Attorney Mary Ippel, Briggs and Morgan, presented proposed Resolution <br />84-36 providing for public sale of $600,000 general obligation tax incre- <br />ment bonds of 1984, Series B, and proposed Final Dote Resolution 84-37. <br />She explained that the closing scheduled on the Industrial Revenue Bonds <br />and the sale of the filling station, plus payment of the mortgage on the <br />eight lots (scheduled for October ll) had been delayed due to some financing <br />changes. Robert Collins, Attorney for Bullseye Golf, explained that <br />costs are much higher now than anticipated due to the City's request for <br />exterior enhancement, winter construction, and phase construction because <br />the Flameburger lease does not expire until April 30, 1985, an increase <br />of $100,000. For that reason, Mr. Collins stated that Bullseye plans to <br />defer starting construction until spring after the Flameburger-lease has <br />expired. Council expressed concern that the project would not be completed <br />by the deadline stipulated in the development agreement (December 31, 1985), <br />but Mr. Collins assured that there would be no problen, they anticipate con- <br />struction being completed in 4 to 5 months. He also stated that Bullseye <br />will make some changes to reduce costs, but National City Bank does not <br />want the value of construction reduced. Mayor Eggert stated he had a <br />problem with changing the dollar amount as it will change the amount of <br />funds generated by the tax increment financing. Mr. Collins said the value <br />of the building for tax purposes would not change. Attorney Ippel recommended <br />that both items be approved at this time, and if the Industrial Revenue <br />Bonds are not closed by November 5, 1984 and the filling station has not been <br />purchased, the TIF bond sale could be cancelled. She recommended it be <br />stipulated that if the market-value change is below what is necessary to <br />amortize the funds, the sale must be cancelled. <br />Councilmember Ciernia asked what the City's liability is with signing the <br />IDB Note Resolution. Attorney Ippel stated that the City is used only as <br />a conduit, the note will be purchased by National City Bank, and payments <br />will be made by Bullseye under the loan agreement. The note does not con- <br />stitute a debt to the City. <br /> <br />PUBLIC <br />HEARING ON <br />TIF <br />FINANCING <br />FOR LIDO <br />CAFE <br />SCHEDULED <br />BULLSEYE <br />GOLF, INC. <br />PROPOSED <br />RESOLUTION <br />ON TIF <br />BONDS & <br />IDB NOTE <br />Councilmembers Baldwin and Ciernia inquired what equity Bullseye has in the <br />project and Mr. Collins replied that it is approximately $40,000 after <br />paying off the mortgage on the eight lots (mortgage held by Midway National). <br />Other items regarding the Bullseye finances were discussed. Councilmember <br />Baldwin then questioned why Bullseye was allowed to deposit a $20,000 cashiers <br />check rather than a letter of credit as stipulated in the development agreement. <br />Attorney Ippel stated that the cashier's check is better than a letter <br />of credit, and that Miller Schroder has done a very thorough financial in- <br />vestigation. Mr. Baldwin expressed concern that since the development <br />agreement stipulates there must be a letter of credit, and no letter of <br />credit was provided, they would be in violation of the agreement, and that <br />he would not have voted in favor of the agreement if that stipulation had <br />not been included. Attorney Van de North stated he and Attorney Gasteazoro <br />made the decision to accept the cashier's check and that they were remiss <br />in not polling Council. The Banking Attorney at Briggs and Morgan also <br />felt is was proper and not a material change in the agreement. Following <br />the discussion, Mayor Eggert moved, seconded by Councilmember Chestovich, <br />that the $20,000 cashier's check be accepted in lieu of the letter of credit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.