Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING ~ v <br />DECEMBER 6, 1984 <br />A special meeting of the Falcon Heights City Council was called to order at <br />8:20 P.M. by Mayor Eggert. <br />Mayor Eggert, Councilmembers Ciernia, Baldwin, Hard and Chestovich. Also PRESENT <br />present were Attorney Gasteazoro, Attorney Ippel, and Fiscal Consultant <br />Afelbacher. <br />None. ABSENT <br />Attorney Ippel presented proposed Resolution 84-43 relating to Tax PROPOSED <br />Increment Financing and Industrial Revenue Bonds for development of the DEVELOPMENT <br />southeast corner of Larpenteur and Snelling, together with the develop- ON SE CORNER <br />er's application (Milton Cohen). Mr. Cohen explained that the partner- LARPENTEUR/ <br />ship has not yet been formed, but will consist of himself (75%) and SNELLING <br />his brother Harvey (25%). The property to be developed is at present <br />owned by Property Growth Limited, and purchase of the property will <br />be one of the requirements in the loan agreement. Attorney Ippel stated <br />that there are funds in the State Industrial Revenue Bond Pool for 1984 <br />and although it is past the deadline for application, there is a method <br />by which application can be made at this date. Rich Johnson, Piper, <br />Jaffray and Hopwood, explained that his firm will put up the required <br />one percent fee and enter into an agreement with Mr. Cohen. <br />Fiscal Consultant Apfelbacher presented his letter dated December 6, 1984, <br />regarding Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, and reviewed each item with Council. <br />He explained the difference between Revenue Bonds and General Obligation <br />Bonds, the advantages, and disadvantages of each, and stated that most <br />Tax Increment Financing Bonds have General Obligation backing. Attorney <br />Ippel stressed that issuance of bonds with G/0 backing is less expensive <br />thus allowing more funds for improvements, etc. Mr. Johnson concurred <br />with the Attorney. <br />Eldon Metaxis, owner of the Round Bobbin Sewing Center, located in the <br />building which would be demolished for redevelopment, expressed concern <br />for the merchants now leasing space in the existing building. Mr. <br />Cohen stated that the new building would give an advantage to the merchants <br />as there will be more people entering the new facility. He also assured <br />Mr. Metaxis that the present tenants would be welcome in the facility. <br /> <br />Following the discussion, Mayor Eggert moved, seconded by Councilmember <br />Chestovich, that Resolution 84-43 be adopted. Motion carried unanimously. <br />RESOLUTION 84-43 RESOLUTION <br />84-43 <br />RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROJECT UNDER THE MUNICIPAL <br />INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT; GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL <br />TO THE PROJECT AND THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE <br />TIiIS PROJECT, AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON <br />AND GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ISSUANCE OF TAX <br />INCREMENT BONDS FOR THE PROJECT <br />BULLSEYE <br />Attorney Gasteazoro informed Council that Bullseye Golf wishes to GOLF REQUESTS <br />install a small paint booth in the municipal liquor store building which TO PLACE PAINT <br />is now being rented by Bullseye, and that she would not recommend allow- BOOTH IN LIQUO <br />STORE <br />BUILDING DENIE <br />