CCMin_85Apr24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING/PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 24, 1985 PAGE 2 ~- 45 that a public hearing be scheduled for May 22, 1985 at 8:30 P.M., and that publication be authorized. Motion carried unanimously. At 7:15 P.M. Mayor Eggert opened the Public Hearing on proposed amendments to the Municipal Code and presented the Affidavit of Publication. Attorney Van de North presented the changes as follows: Chapter 9-10.01 be amended to include beauty shops, barber shops, tanning studios, and video rental shops, and Chapter 9-4.01, Subd. 5(g) relating to the use of streets for vehicle repair. There being no one wishing to be heard, Mayor Eggert closed the hearing at 7:24 P.M. and moved adoption of Ordinance No. 0-85-8. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Ciernia, and carried unanimously. ORDINANCE N0. 0-85-8 ORDINANCE 0-85-8 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO PERMITTED USES IN THE B-2 BUSINESS DISTRICT AND THE SERVICE AND REPAIR OF VEHICLES ON STREETS The item relating to authorizing the Fiscal Consultant to prepare a tax TIF PLAN increment financing plan for the Lido/St. Mary's project was deferred to DEFERRED TO the meeting of May 22, 1985. 5/22/85 Engineer Schunicht recommended that the matter of ordering plans and ST. MARY'S specifications for extension of storm sewer on St. Mary's be deferred STORM to May 22, 1985. He explained that there is ponding on the Croft and DRAINAGE Meyers properties and it would be appropriate to solve the problem at DEFERRED the time of the Lido construction. TO 5/22/85 Jan Bykowski, 1745 St. Mary's questioned the presence of any problem JAN BYCOWSKI as a part of the Croft property has successfully been used as a garden. 1745 ST. Engineer replied and he and the Clerk Administrator had observed water MARY'S ponding on the site and as an engineer he felt it was desirable to drain areas needing drainage. Steve Reiter, 1746 Fry, inquired if the Lido had requested the storm STEVE REITER drainage as the matter was placed under Lido on the agenda. Mayor 1746 FRY Eggert explained that he felt it appropriate to include it with the Lido discussion, however, it was not requested by the Lido owners. The matter was deferred to May 22 as recommended by tYe Engineer. Attorney Van de North reviewed a memo dated April 16, 1985 prepared by PROPOSED Attorney Gasteazoro relating to revisions to the proposed liquor ordinance. LIQUOR Council discussed at length the ratio of food to liquor, the possibility ORDINANCE of controlling sale of liquor based on square footage, ratio of seats for DISCUSSED food compared to liquor, control by limiting the purchase of liquor, and Councilmember Hard's memo dated April 23, 1985 stating his objection to having open on-sale licenses. Council also discussed the number of licenses now in use and whether or not that number should be reduced or phased out over a period of time. The discussion was interrupted for the public hearing scheduled for 7:45 P.M. Mayor Eggert opened the Public Hearing on the Ray Brown Subdivision Request, BROWN presented the Affidavit of Publication, and then moved, seconded by SUBDIVISION Councilmember Ciernia, that the hearing be continued until Mr. Brown could HEARING complete an emergency fire call. Motion carried unanimously. DELAYED