CCMin_85Jun19_Special - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 19, 1985 PAGE 5 objectionable from the City's standpoint, it would take the City Council out of public domain and into private domain. Council must serve the whole community. Attorney Van de North did not feel it would be an appropriate use of the property (terms of which are unknown), it places too much burden on the developer, is unreasonable leverage. Following the discussion, Mayor Eggert moved, seconded by Councilmember Chenoweth, that the City Attorney be authorized to prepare a resolution granting the conditional use with the following conditions: (1) adequate screening/landscaping/lighting, (2) parking restricted to that shown on the June 13, 1985 plan prepared by the City Planner, (3) acquisition of the proper access to Croft property parking and the west side of vacated portion of St. Mary's, either by private negotiations or condemnation, (4) adequate maintenance and repair of the private parking lot, (5) adequate public access, and (6) the project is to commence within one year. Motion carried unanimously. Councilmember Hard moved, seconded by Councilmember Ciernia, that a PUBLIC public hearing on the vacation of a portion of St. Mary's St. be HEARING ON scheduled for July 24, 1985 at 7:30 P.M. and that the Clerk Administrator VACATION OF be authorized to publish the notice. Motion carried unanimously. ST. MARY'S SCHEDULED Attorney Van de North presented the latest draft of the proposed FOR 7/24/85 liquor ordinance and reviewed the requested changes. John Labalestra requested that the banquet area be excluded from the 45/557 food/ LIQUOR ordinance. Motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE Following a discussion it was decided to exclude banquet facilities from the liquor ratio and that "banquet room" be added under Subdivision 2 - Definition of Terms, such definition to read "a separate designated room which is customarily used for banquets and parties". Attorney Van de North explained that existing State law does not allow issuance of an off-sale wine license and referred to his memorandum of June 19, 1985. He felt the only way the Lido could be granted a license to sell wine and cordials in the deli would be to issue an off-sale intoxicating liquor license. Councilmember Baldwin strongly opposed issuing dual licenses. Mayor Eggert moved, seconded by Councilmember Baldwin, that the meeting MEETING be extended three minutes to continue the discussion. Motion carried EXTENDED unanimously. After resuming the liquor discussion, Council concurred that the ordinance should be adopted as is and any necessary changes could be discussed at a later date. Councilmember Ciernia move, seconded by Councilmember Chenoweth, that Ordinance No. 0-85-10 be adopted. Motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE N0. 0-85-10 ORDINANCE 0-85-10 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A LIQUOR CONTROL ORDINANCE WITHIN THE CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS