Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />OCTOBER 9„ 1985 ~ ~,~'v <br />PAGE 3 <br />developers, explained that one building has been sold and sale of a <br />second nearly finalized. Councilmember Chenoweth expressed concern <br />over the phasing aspect of the project, how the bond monies would <br />be distributed, and that this be specifically stated in the financing <br />plan. The discussion was interrupted for the public hearing scheduled <br />for 7:30 P.M. <br />Mayor Eggert opened the Public Hearing on Improvement of the Alley PUBLIC <br />North of Larpenteur Running From Snelling Drive to Arona at 7:30 HEARING ON <br />P.M., and presented the Affidavit of Publication and Mailing. Engineer ALLEY NORTH <br />Schunicht then provided the public with a hand-out on the project, and OF LARPENTEU <br />explained the proposed project and assessments. He indicated that the SNELLING TO <br />bids came in higher than anticipated due to the late fall construction. ARONA <br />Councilmember Ciernia asked if the Bullseye construction directly led <br />to deterioration of the alley, to which Engineer Schunicht replied that <br />the alley was not good before but the construction definitely added to <br />the deterioration. <br /> <br />Vince Landis, 1538 Crawford, felt the alley construction has nothing VINCE LANDIS <br />to do with him and he should not be assesed as his driveway is on 1538 CRAWFOR: <br />Crawford and he does not use the alley. He questioned whether or <br />not Bullseye agreed to repair the alley after their construction <br />is completed. Mr. Landis felt none of the residents should pay as the <br />alley is used primarily by Bullseye and Embers. Engineer Schunicht <br />replied that the residential properties would benefit, the alley is <br />available for their use and Attorney Van de North concurred. Mr. <br />Landis commented on the fact that the Bullseye contractor was on <br />this date repairing and surfacing the alley. <br />Council discussed at length whether or not Bullseye could be required ATTORNEY TO <br />to repair the alley before a certificate of occupancy is issued. RESEARCH <br />Clerk Administrator Barnes referred to his list of items which BULLSEYE'S <br />was presented to the owner of Bullseye for completion prior to REPAIR OF <br />an occupancy certificate being issued, and the fact that Mr. Hunt ALLEY <br />acknowledged the list, in writing. Attorney Van de North will <br />research the matter. <br />Tom Dieters, 1540 Crawford, commented on the fact that Bullseye is TOM DIETERS, <br />at present doing some repairs and tarring the Embers lot, and asked 1540 <br />if the City could then tear it up for reconstruction. Engineer CRAWFORD <br />Schunicht will check to determine exactly to what extent repairs <br />are being done and whether or not it is adequate. <br />Vince Landis, 1538 Crawford, also asked who would be responsible for ALLEY <br />snow plowing, and was informed owners must contract with a private PLOWING <br />plower for service. Mr. Landis indicated that the residents have DISCUSSED, <br />been paying for the plowing but the businesses did not participate. CODE TO BE <br />Attorney Van de North and Clerk Administrator Barnes will prepare AMENDED TO <br />an amendment to the code requiring plowing of the alleys. REQUIRE <br />PLOWING <br />George Peck, 1456 Crawford, felt that assessing six homes seemed <br />disapportionate when the business (approximately 14 stores) cause GEORGE <br />the traffic in the alley, whereas most homeowners make one or PECK, <br />two trips per day. Mr. Peck stated that the damage to the alley 1456 <br />started with the Flower City fire and continued to deteriorate. CRAWFORD <br />Mayor Eggert explained the assessment policy and that commercial <br />properties are charged at a higher rate than residential. <br />