Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES _ '~ <br />SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />OCTOBER 7, 1981 <br />PAGE 6 <br />Warkentin mentioned that Falcon Heights had paid $88,000 to St. Paul OVERFLOW (cont. <br />over twenty years ago for separation of sewers which was never done, <br />and if St. Paul desires to start over then the $88,000 plus interest, <br />and inflation factor should be returned to Falcon Heights. <br />Attorney Allen informed that he had checked into whether a 10% per SEWER LATE <br />quarter late penalty on sewer charges violated any law. He stated PENALTY CHARGE <br />that is all depends on whether or not a court of law would consider it <br />to be a penalty or interest. If it were determined to be a penalty <br />there would be no problem. Council agreed that the intent is to <br />charge a penalty. <br />In reply to a question raised at a previous meeting Attorney A11en CONTINGENCY <br />informed that the City could contingency zone the University of ZONING DIS- <br />Minnesota property. Councilmember Larson stated that the Planning CUSSION <br />Commission has addressed the matter in conjunction with the re- <br />writing of the Zoning Ordinance. Councilmember Eggert inquired as <br />to the City`s legal right without contingency zoning and was assured <br />by the City Attorney that all P1 and P2 areas would remain P1 and P2 <br />even if it is sold. If the land is to be used for any other purpose <br />it would require rezoning. <br /> Councilmember Brown informed Council that the Fire Department is FIRE DEPT. STET <br /> holding the annual steak fry on October 24, 1981 at 6:00 p.m. at FRY TO BE HELD <br /> the City Hall. All <br />Members should make Councilmembers are invited and all interested <br />reservations two to three days in advance. 10/24/81 <br />DANCE TICKET <br /> Councilmember Brown also noted that the Fire Department has begun SALES BEGiN <br /> sale of tickets for the annual dance. <br />Councilmember Larson stated that Mr. Philip Meyers had attended the <br />October 5, 1981 Planning Commission Meeting in an attempt to obtain <br />approval to construct a 6-plea on the property at 1899 W. Larpenteur. <br />Councilmember Larson was concerned that even though the Planning <br />Commission informed Mr. Meyers that he must come back to the Com- <br />mission with plans, Mr. Meyers` reaction indicated that he had no <br />doubt but what approval would be granted. Councilmember Brown, who <br />attended the Planning Commission Meeting, stated that the Gom- <br />mission informed Mr. Meyers that they had nothing to work with and <br />must have plans. Council directed the Clerk Administrator to mail <br />a copy of the October 5, 1981 Planning Commission Minutes to Mr. <br />Meyers to clarify the matter. <br />DISCUSSION ON <br />PROPOSED 6-PLEA <br />1899 W. <br />LARPENTEUR <br />Council discussed the problem of Council, Commission and Committee RULING ON USE <br />Members contacting consulting employees such as Attorney,-Engineer OF CONTRACTUAL <br />Planner, etc.. Council directed the Clerk Administrator to write a EMPLOYEES BY <br />letter to all Commission and Committee members requesting that members COUNCIL, COM- <br />must refrain from using consulting services without the express re- MISSION AND <br />quest of the Council as the Council is the only body which can author- COMMITTEE <br />ize expenditures of public funds. In regard to Councilmembers, Attorney MEMBERS <br />Allen recommended that any subject which would require research should <br />first be approved by Council before contacting consultants, but that <br />simple problems, such as clarification of matters, be allowed on an <br />individual basis. <br />