Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES ~:+ ~-, <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />FEBRUARY 24, 1982 <br />PAGE 3 <br />Clerk Administrator Barnes presented proposed Ordinance ~~188 increasing SEWER CHARG <br />the sanitary sewer charges. He explained that the charges to the City INCREASE <br />by the Metro Waste Control Commission for the year 1982 have been in- DISCUSSION <br />creased from $172,231.93 in 1981 to $280,321:.74 making it necessary to <br />increase the City's charges to users as follows: Residential $19.00 <br />per quarter-Commercial to $,73 per thousand gallons. <br />In answer to a question from Councilmember Eggert regarding the purpose <br />of charging over the amount necessary to cover the Metro Waste charges, <br />Clerk Administrator Barnes explained that the overage will be held in <br />the sanitary sewer fund for any necessary repairs to the sewer lines. <br />He also explained that the a survey of sewer charges in surrounding <br />communities indicated that many have much higher rates than those pro- <br />posed for Falcon Heights. <br />Mayor Warkentien mentioned the fact that Roseville has a reduced rate <br />for senior citizens and that he, personally, did not think Falcon Heights <br />should consider a special rate for seniors, but that Council should be <br />aware of the fact in the event they receive phone calls on the matter. <br />Clerk Administrator Barnes explained that Roseville is more able to <br />subsidize seniors due to the fact that Roseville has large commercial <br />accounts. <br />Councilmember Ciernia inquired as to whether or not the increased charges <br />made by Metro Waste Control includes overflow charges. Clerk Administrator <br />Barnes informed that there is a $5,200 charge for lake overflow, however, <br />that amount will be held back until the overflow matter is resolved. <br />Councilmember Eggert asked what kind of potential problems might occur <br />and if the reserve ($100,000 presently in the fund plus the addition <br />of $70,000 during 1982) is adequate, inadequate or excessive. Engineer <br />Lemberg replied that sewer cleaning, any contractual labor, cave ins, <br />sewer line breaks, etc. would be paid from the fund and that $100,000 <br />would not be adequate in the event of extensive repairs. In reply to <br />an inquiry by Councilmember Eggert, Engineer Lemberg explained that many <br />variables enter in to the method by which communities determine adequate <br />reserves for sewer problems such as the type of sewer system, depth of <br />sewers, a percentage of the length of sewers, etc. <br />Clerk Administrator Barnes explained that the revenues which will be <br />kept in reserve, hopefully, will be sufficient so that rate increases <br />will not be necessary for several years even though the Waste Control <br />Commission can increase their rates at any time. Councilmember Eggert <br />stated he was not unhappq with the increase but did not feel it would <br />be reasonable to add $70,000 yearly to the reserve fund. He agreed it <br />was necessary to build up the depleted fund. <br />Councilmember Larson moved, seconded by Councilmember Ciernia, that <br />Ordinance X188 be adopted as presented and that the Clerk Administrator <br />be authorized to publish the same. Motion carried unanimously. <br />