Laserfiche WebLink
rzINUTEs <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MARCH 23, 1983 <br />PAGE 3 <br /> <br /> <br />consider amending the Development District to include that site. He then TIF & <br />furnished information on the timing required for these hearings. Council- DEVELOPMENT <br />member Eggert moved, seconded by Councilmember Ciernia, that .Resolution DIST (cont.} <br />83-7 be adopted setting the hearing date for the above mentioned items. <br />I4otion carried unanimously. <br />RESOLUTION 83-8 <br />A RESOLUTION CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR MODIFICATION <br />OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPt~NT DISTRICT N0. <br />Z AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PROPOSED TAX INCREI~NT DISTRICT <br />N0. 1 AND THE ADOPTION OF A TAX INCRII~IENT FINANCING PLAN <br />RELATING THERETO <br />Fire Chief Renchin reviewed his seven item priority list covering items FIRE DEPT. <br />previously requested by the Department. After a thorough discussion of PRIORITY <br />the items and alternate means of financing them, Councilmember Chestovich ITEMS <br />moved, seconded by Councilmember Eggert, that $1,013.05 for typed items DISCUSSED <br />1, 2 and 5 be authorized, the amount to be taken from the Contingency <br />Fund. Mayer h'arkentien offered an amendment whereupon Council.members <br />Chestovich and Eggert withdrew the motion and second. Mayor Warkentien <br />then moved, seconded by Council.member Chestovich, to authorize an expendi- <br />ture of $3,877.05 for the purchase of typed items 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 to be <br />paid from the Contingency Fund. Motion carried unanimously. <br />John Peterson, Good Value Homes, informed Council that the extension of JOHN <br />roads may not be as simple as it seems in that they could cross University PETERSON <br />property if roads were run straight, more consideration would have to be GOOD VALUE <br />given to drainage, and it would be costly to re-route the run-off. HOMES <br />John Urban, Good Value Homes, also indicated that a need might be created <br />for variances if tdle lots could not be configured to accommodate a road <br />to Cleveland. Also, all the water flows in one direction and it works <br />well with the proposed street configuration and in reversing the street <br />it might result in more costs attempting to re-direct the water flow. <br />Good Value Homes would like to evaluate these two concerns and then decide <br />whether or not the road could be re-directed. <br />Councilmember Eggert presented for consideration proposed Ordinance #197. <br />He explained that Group W proposes to put in equipment which is a modi- <br />fied version of the originally proposed equipment and everything under <br />consideration so far were items where the equipment had actually been <br />upgraded. The North Suburban Cable Communications Commission desires <br />to be able to approve those types of upgrading changes without it being <br />necessary for each City Council to approve it. Councilmember Eggert <br />then moved that Ordinance ,#19? be adopted and that publication be authorized. <br />Motion was seconded by Councilmember Chestovich and carried unanimously. <br />ORDINANCE #197 <br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 193 KNOWN <br />AS THE CABLE COT~NNICATIONS ORDINANCE. <br />Frank E. Villaume, Attorney at Law, representing Mr. and Mrs. Norbert <br />Hermes (Falcon Shopping Center) ref erred to his letter dated March 15, <br />1983 regarding an interpretation of Ordinance No. 174 relating tR <br />.advertising signs. Clerk Administrator Barnes had informed Mr. and Mrs. <br />JOHN URBAN <br />ORDINANCE <br />N0. 19? <br />ADVERTISING <br />SIGN ORD. <br />NO . l7lt <br />DISCUSSED <br />