CCMin_83Apr20_Special/Public_Hearing

Home Browse Search

TAtT Tr~*~'~' i`illV V 1L+.~ ~ ~~ SPE(:IAL CI i'Y CGUNCIL I•Li~:TI':vG,1T'LTBLIC H~i't'~Ir~GS aPP~IT. 2C, 1983 A special meeting of the Falcon ~-ieigrts City Council was ca7.7_ed. to order S " at 7:3~' P.:•. by iayor ~var];Ent~.en. arkerltien, Counczlmembers C.erns.a Ches{<,ovich ~:~~~ez't at^ad Larson. 'Ia :fir t.,' , ~ ~.~ P'r~r;Sl~r~T Also present wets Clerk Administra.+,,or Barnes, Engineer Schunicht and Attorney Van de uo_•th. A$::~~1T i~(one . ~:ayor '•arkentien opened the Public ,iear~.ng on Charles ;a~,~Tki.ns ::;state subdivision ;~e~,uest at 7:3C P.2°. a_nd presented the Affidavit of affidavit of. °osting and. Certificate of Nailing. e then Publication , turned the floor over to James laenner, First National ~3ank of P~~inneapo~_is. ir. i~:aenner presented the request of the Charles :faT~kins estate to sub- JArLs' divide a 17 acre plot, khich will be sold to Good Value I~:::~mes. Council- ~AEI1N~~t metrber Ciernia pointed out the par'_~c dedication ordinance, which states lST NATIOP3Ai. that as a condi Lion for subdivision land. or cash in lieu of land must be HANK OF T~:?i::%, given to the C~_t~r. T~:r. ~aenner stated that Goad Value Homes will .~ ssume that obligation and John Peterson of Good Value Homes understands that he will pay park dedication fees based upon the l7 acre parcel. In reply to a cuestion l~;;r Caaznci~~°~e:~~ber ~gez't, Ccuncilmember C:~.ernia informed that any parcel of five acres or more requires p~.rk dedication. Attorrlc~,~ Van de .north Mated he has nevi owed the Ordinance and felt that the park dedicati on iss~a.e coT.z~_~ be addressed at either the subdivision or platting public heari:~. Mr. Petersen indicated he V:as a~,are of the ordinance and a€reed to the eight percent park dedi.eation required by the ordinance. area Jorthrop, 192 S~.z-nmer, asked if the bank tiaould be responsible far par'_> dedication on the rer-~aining; acreage. :Ir. TYTaenner felt that trey were requesting onlj* one subdivision and par'_~c dedication applied tc the 1.7 acres. yrs. i~orthrup t'~en i.nc~uired how park dedication could be obtained on the entire 23 ~-:_cres. Councilmert~arry~J;ert agreed with sirs. Northrup that if there is no futuz'e subdivision an the Ta.,kins porti on of the property tha Cite t-ould~ rave no way to collect on tee remaining; f:~ve acres. Attarne~Y 'Tan de I~lorth felt I°irs. Northrup made a gooc point t~ocause tee languaga of section ?~.2: of Grdir..ance ;~?90, does state th~.t as a con- dition of approval_ of anJr subd vision of 7_and of foTar acres or more the owner shall. c~edica.te a portion of the gross axes of such land. ~Ir. :iaenner stated that i f -uhe City makes i+., a requirement of subdi?Ti.sion ~`Lu'~at park dedication be included on the rema7-Wing acreage, he ~c-oul.d bQ l.n a~ref;;?lent Of t?. cash paT~ment. tittorne~~ 6jan de ivOrth felt that 1f the adner of the ~.2 acres a~.oT.zld rar_yuest subidi~ris%on, a oar?c dedication could again be requested at teat t-ir°.e. rarol_d :dilsen, ~.?p?z Tatum, said h.is understanding is that a portion of the 1?.nd is to ?-~e deal C.atEd for eassment for steer? .~a.ter purposes and a,^'.:.ed ra:: that z~:oulc' ~ffeet a^.r': dedication. ~,'~~tcz°rlc~~~ vari ~e .ortr e_~pl<~.inec teat sa?cr as easem~:nt 3_s pat one of the t~t?z'r~n;se~~ to z.-hich the ~z'd~.r,.anc "'Jpl1ES. ?~t ~pplze;s a~ C3ec,1Cat10n !'or th.e publ~.C nar'cs, cuen spC•CE, teal ~ s"vr~tP.m Or Othe p?~b~.ic '~ EiCre~~.ti on?1_ purposes. LC,1~"1C'• ~_Irle'T'}JEI' v1 e= `~ el. ~ ~_.G. ~. p~ r.._ de ~__ca _nn - o ~ a ~- a entlrE 23 ?cres anc'~_ future sub.'s?'? SiC?Y). (`f t1"±.E c'.2 ..~._, , _ COl?~ ~~ ~?C: Z.~~-~-?rC'C ~^Y' T?TUB.~.I~ ilLtliL-' l:`a~rn_ . .,..~e1.'en t~. c=n C~O`iyd th (? D:a~;~_ll. •i~`i r~_T+c> ~'~~ ?:~ P.... ING CLCJJ '~ AT 7:0 P.T.