CCMin_83Apr20_Special/Public_Hearing

Home Browse Search

P1?' '; rl~a~ it 1L' :J Cra,CTt~a~ C?TY CCiirClL ~'1'Idi~h'uiyTC i~,ii.T~GS hp:ilL `G, 1~g3 s01.IthCr:i u.I'a:,« 'v~_~~. ~,,J deep e:^ 'LO aci;o?ryrodate t~:e re,1l~.i'_"C'd po''ld~_Pi and to help separate. the ~°asrdx~ntiaZ fro:- the '~usvnt.ss area. ~e~^~:i~zb an~u screerzizaS c-~il~. also h~s in th..s ponciin~ aria. As far as access t0 Ciezrelanu '.~:~ concerned, a traffic :~tlldy done b~ Jaci' rinderson 1iuuOCiateS ;>hoSved 'what u11e road 'ti'di~TZld On~v Carl~j'Lr~'r trips per day and trould riot :eet any requirements for need :,r• benefit, e.~peci all~~ i_n tk.e cos;, ar~<A. The proposed roads will car~;;r less tr~~ff~_c than a no~r:a~ ., ~_~e, age; ~'^ ors to ~ ~•ity street. I".P ilevelc~?~sr is ~,ork~.nC ~vri th ~'~ ~, E Shift ail easei?iEnt for a pathwa~y t0 t12e pari<: dE~eper ?_n+.,O ihe1 new develOp- ~ent t}°~us r;ovin.g it arday frog. the existw.ng rei~hborhood and. still prcv_de pedestrial access to thr oars: fro:'i the development and the neighbors to tr.e north. Tf~e.°e is~ :wlso w~ uti 1 it3r easement to the south ~~~hich t~-i.11 ora4°ide :~not'~er o~~destrial access to the south. Couneilmember :arson asp-;ed if benefitt.nt; ^roparty wou'.~.~ na;;, for the stor; sever and -r. U"cazz adti~ised ~~hat all of thii; bezxefi.ttirzS property ct:ners T.~ould 1>e assessed in ~~e nc~~d development and ~..f ether property is bc;nefitted in the e: i sting neighborhood, it t~dould probab~~y be discussed at an assessment heal~i :~; when. _t has been determined t~dhat benefits havz been received. Erlbineer Schanicht interjected that whEn the sto~rra water sewer p'_wn was developed for the area, it teas assumed that there tdoutd be sor;:e asSrdSS7TientS -~_n the ~+'alcon L~oods area. ~v'nen the costs are developed, they ,ti*ill be presented at an assessment heariz~; . ~~ U:~,J ~COntj LA:~:~GN/ Ui~+.J/ SCtIUdiC HT CourciL~,eanber Ebgert inquired whether or not wood Value iomec tdould •::e t~di1~.- LGGEi~.T,~ i ~ to hold thc: sa~_e of one lot fo~:• a period of one year in the event PET;N~I-t.SGN the City tv-ishes to purchase it. dx•. Peterson stated that t~~e offer to ho? d the iot open ~•i th '„he C_;.ty having 'the option to bv:,;r still stands, i.n the event that i t i s demonstrated the+,, the Cleveland access is necessary. i~iarold Zilsen referred to the April ? 8th manning Cczrr:i scion iinutes t~dhere ~_t udas stated that 8~ percent of fh~~ traffic ~~ou~_d go to the east. rie also again ::Mated treat it is too costly and with the possibili ty of future damage c:lai?-ris e~rom the tiz:ivez~si~y of :innesota. It could become an attractive nuisance, a lover's lane, and cause damage to ti.e park. `i'he evidence against the constrx°t:?ctyon of a street west to Cleveland is ove~~wh elmin~ . Counci ln~e7rtber Ci ernia ref errera to George Plant ~ s concern regardiz~ the location cf tre pathway from ~,Z~e park. The Planning Commission fel}~ thi easement s~.culd be shifted down to be located between Lots ~3 and 2'~. finis issue should be addressed in the development agreement. Some othexr ite~s to be dealt tti-d..th in tt;.c a.~•ee~nent a~~e hoty the con- struction equipment will arr•s_;re at the site, location cf the model homes, letter cf credit and the p=archasing by Good Value ricmes of an;;r informati on previously prepared fog" the Ar.eri.can Shelter r.~evelopment. i~:ay-cr ~;arkentien closed th:~ "u~:~.?_c nearing at 9:16 ^.~i. ~aycr ~uarkenti~;r~ zoved, seconded by Counci lmember Larson, that resolution 83-11 be ~_dopted. Council F~gert offered an amendzi;ent ~to the resolution that a aro~,rision to hold the development of or_e to#,; for one gear, +..he location of the m~ode~_ homes, and ? ocation tahere heaTay equipment should arrive be addressers in the development agree<nent. •1av~or ~r~arkent>_en :~.iia Councilmerabe?" Larson accepted the r~ARCLD i1ILSEN DISCUSSIG;1 GF' LV~GP- I~:":~dT AGid~rE- ~~TJT PUBIC r ~ A.A~~Ii3G C LG S