My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMin_78Mar22
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
197x
>
1978
>
CCMin_78Mar22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:02:44 PM
Creation date
6/18/2009 9:53:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING : '3 <br />MARCf~ 22 , 1978 <br />Page 4 <br />Councilman Steele questioned why there was so much COUNCILMAN <br />more on sidewalk construction. STEELE <br />There were several carriage walks put in and several ENGINEER <br />replace d, not originally included in the project and LEMBERG <br />the corner at the end of the street at Pascal, both <br />corners, sidewalks were put in. The additional carriage <br />walkways were requested by the homeowners making an <br />over run. In other words, the homeowner, when re- <br />questing the additional carriage walk is really in- <br />creasing costs and should be informed of this. In <br />some cases we had to replace them because of the <br />grades, but in most cases, the carriage walks were <br />placed at the request of the homeowner, because of <br />broken up sidewalks, or misalignments, a couple of <br />them were low, they were replaced at their request. <br />They would not have been replaced normally? COUNCILMAN <br /> STEELE <br />No, they would not have under the contract. ENGINEER <br /> LEMBERG <br />So the homeowner is asking this to be done? At the COUNCILMAN <br />same time, was the homeowner told this would cost STEELE <br />extra? <br />This was discussed at the time with Clerk Administrator ENGINEER <br />Barnes and the contractor and in addition to that, LEMBERG <br />there was one large driveway that was totally replaced, <br />our normal driveways out here have been carried back 3' <br />from the curb, this was carried all the way back to the <br />lot line rather than putting in a bituminous narrow <br />strip. <br />There was quite an overage of bituminous than what COUNCILMAN <br />was estimated. STEELE <br />There was an overage of 25 tons, approx. two truck ENGINEER <br />loads. This again was something Mr. Barnes and I LEMBERG <br />discussed, on the east end of the project, there had <br />been for many years, water standing at that inter- <br />section, a Swale was installed to carry the water <br />around the intersection. <br />You have a difference of $4.33 from the estimated GEORGE KILGORE <br />assessment cost. 1494 Idaho <br />We are talking construction costs, not overall costs, ENGINEER <br />engineering, et<:, `r1_e scd estimate is under, side- LEMBERG - <br />walk is over. I can't estimate bituminous down to two ANSWERS TO <br />loads, I don't think anyone can. Because if there is AUDIENCE <br />a 2" difference in street grade, you can use up two QUESTIONS <br />loads very easily. These are estimated quanties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.