My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMin_68Jul25
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
196x
>
1968
>
CCMin_68Jul25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 9:02:22 AM
Creation date
6/22/2009 9:23:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 749 <br />Attorney Seed stated regarding boundary lines of <br />zoning area, there is an allowance of fifty feet <br />into another zoning district. MMr. Sullivants <br />objections to petition appear to be invalid. <br />John Bureau stated that as to the need for this type <br />of operation, he doesn~t think the question of needing this type <br />of business should enter into opposition. As far as he's concerned, <br />the income level of the community and the surrounding <br />area can handle something better than 15¢ hamburgers. <br />the otherrestaurants in the area are doing very well <br />and this one will, too. He believes most people in <br />Falcon Heights would be glad to have this type of <br />establishment. <br />Brooks Church, Jr. 1865 Larpenteur Avenue brought <br />up two points of concern: (1) precedence set by <br />rezoning this spot with reference to other spots on <br />Larpenteur and what could come as result of <br />.this precedences and (2) as far as traffic - <br />perhaps engineer would have opinion on whether or <br />not a Mr. Steak Restaurant is going to bring about <br />an undesirable U turn situation - a traffic pattern <br />in and out which would lead to congestion. If U turn <br />this would conflict with the rest of the system that <br />was recently set up in Falcon Heights. <br />Lemberg said that if apartment were built there, the <br />same problem would be created. The county can always <br />limit no turning if it so warrants. County is not <br />going to give curb cut along median for every apartment <br />- or restaurant or whatever - it is his opinion that there <br />wontt be too much difference as far as traffic. <br />Mrs. Lloyd Svendsbye, 1905 Fairview Avenue, stated she <br />and her husband bought property two years ago in the <br />good faith that it vrould remain a good residential area. <br />They would very much like to see it remain zoned for <br />residential. Rezoning is the beginning of deterioration - <br />zoning to retail affects property values. There are <br />other areas in the village. They request that this be <br />denied. <br />Black informed her it was not zoned residential and <br />there are other possible alternatives as far as <br />business establishments on that property. A restaurant <br />is not permitted under conditional use in B1 A area but <br />could be permitted if rezoned to B-2. <br />Dale Bergstedt, 1b15 Maple Knoll Drive, followed up on <br />Mr. Church's points - if county denied U tu'^n to the <br />people on Fry Street because of the heavy traffic, <br />that same traff~:c~'~density is going to exit down the <br />road, or make a U turn down the road. Also to compare <br />restaurant activity to apartment activity is not a <br />good comparison. Suppertime movement at this parti- <br />cular corner is going to be subject to lim~tion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.