My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMin_68Oct10_Meeting_w/citizens
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
196x
>
1968
>
CCMin_68Oct10_Meeting_w/citizens
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 9:06:01 AM
Creation date
6/22/2009 9:35:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
adequate protection of the city and which decision only -such personnel and equipment <br />be safely spared from the city. In the event a fire in St. Paul occurs at the same time ~s <br />the:.fire chief may at his discretion recall from any area such equipment and service to use <br />at the St. Paul fire. In case roads are blocked, such equipment and personnel cannot be <br />. furnished with reasonable safety - St. Paul Fire Chief may refuse to answer the call. <br />Jorrisen: For one thing, you are going to give'~the volunteer firemen a raise. I didn't <br />expect money to be a volunteer, and if I have to go for the extra 50~ I am not going for <br />that, if I have to kick out three competent men - I think that is pretty ridiculous. What <br />about the Police Dept. -the cost -what are we paying them now? How much are we <br />actually going to save ? $10 a year. Our rates will go up. Mr. Mayor, you are a paid <br />man and I help pay, I want some answers. (Jorissen was ruled out of order at this point. <br />Ecklund: The proper people and those who classify rates have told us that getting rid <br />of three paid men will not necessarily affect our fire rating. The only real complaint from <br />those people last time was that we did not het for capital improvements. We are not <br />due for a reclassification for a few years.. I feel that the radio system would more than <br />offset the time delay of the firemen answering the call at the station where he has to make <br />one to five calls because he has to call before he leaves the station. Under the new <br />system everyone will be notified immediately instead of waiting for the call. Eventually, <br />all men are called. Wnat is the difference if the rig gets there if there is no man there? <br />Wm. Bye - 1871 Pascal: What guarantee do we have that those men are going to be <br />listening to those radios? At present, we have assurance. <br />Baden: How long has it been since the volunteers first asked for radios? How long ago <br />• was it that the volunteers asked for radios, both for the trucks and for the monitors? <br />I can take that back to about 1952-53-54-55 ? Radio bids from every place in the area <br />so we could have radio and also radio with sheriff department. Here we are going into <br />radios and taking away three paid men. How come now the radios seem so important <br />when before you didn't need radios? Now the cost is well over what it was when we <br />first asked. I can't understand why it is so important now when before it had no bearing <br />on the case at all. <br />Warkentien: Because now they a~~ tran a.stors -then they were tubes. <br />Baden: We have asked for transistors many times. <br />Ecklund said the m~a~on for radios now is that they are trying to provide better service <br />than now exists. <br />James W~iite -I7I6 Albert Street: Falcon Heights has a good Fire Department anal I second <br />Harold Nilsen`s suggestion that we keep our Fire Dept. - Nilsen then said that his <br />suggestion was that we don't go back to the class 7 rating and he did not make a motion. <br />Stan S~~hultz: I am not accustomed to speaking in front of a group but I would like to <br />go over a few of the things. I have been a full time fireman for sixteen years for Falcon <br />Heights. I don't agree with any of the things Ecklund has brought up. Baden explained <br />quite thoroughly as to the efficiency of full time men. I think we respond immediately <br />and I refer back to what can one man do with a rig. One man -three fires I took care of <br />all by myself by being right there immediately - I extinguished fires without calling i8 to <br />22 men. Farmers Union building -weeds were engulfed in flame at the side of the building. <br />I took a garden hose and put the fire out. I didn't put out a general alarm. Across the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.