My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMin_68Oct17_Special
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
196x
>
1968
>
CCMin_68Oct17_Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 9:06:38 AM
Creation date
6/22/2009 9:37:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2800 <br />1 <br />L~ <br />Black: If that line should give out I don't know what the village could <br />do for you, <br />Radefeldt: If there is a 6" feed in front of our house for the Fire Department, <br />they shouldn't have any trouble with that. <br />B. Pagenkopf: This is all comparatively new to me -- this private line - and <br />1697 I am perfectly happy with the water situation as it is like the <br />Hemline rest of them, <br />Mrs. Alshouse When you were explaining the cost per front foot you were giving <br />1717 Hamline~a. us the cost for Falcon Heights residents .- is it exactly the <br />same as for Roseville residents? <br />Lemberg: We split the cost of the main itself right down the middle - <br />split the cost of engineering, split the cost for boulevard and <br />street repair, legal contingencies, and the cost of hooking up <br />each one of the Falcon Heights residents. Roseville would have <br />the other half plus hook up to their .residents, <br />Question: How much is it going to cost them? <br />Lemberg: Approximately the same .- probably a little more because they have <br />to extend across the street. <br />Alshouse: What are the plans for improving Hemline Avenue? <br />Lemberg: Somewhere between 1970 and 1972. <br />Question: Tf you lay it in the boulevard, that doesn't make any difference <br />does it? <br />Lemberg: It will have to be cut at both places in the street and in the <br />boulevard. so it is affected a little. <br />Rusted: I can't get this quite straight. You have got our cost but you couldn <br />. not know what Roseville's is and yet you talk about a 50-50 <br />split. I got a sneaking hunch that $6.67 is for the Yrhole works. <br />Lemberg: We know Roseville~s share up to the point of their hook up to their <br />lots . If you want that cost , we can get it . <br />Millard: If fire hydrants were installed on the south end, it wouldn't <br />1771 meet requirements. <br />Hemline: <br />Lemberg: No, because there would be still 800. feet between the two; 300 or <br />x+00 feet each way if put right at the end. of the 6" line. <br />Pipkorn: The watermain now is about three feet inside-the street. That <br />doesn't go into the street. Why should we have to pay for street <br />for Roseville. <br />Lemberg: That is for repairing in the boulevard, When I say street I mean <br />the right of way in the street .- sod, etc. <br />Stone: For the record I would like to have Lemberg call off the names and <br />see if they are for or against. <br />i~ <br />Thatcher: <br />Pagenkopf: <br />Brausen: <br />Tonkin: <br />Alshouse: <br />Rust ad <br />Keran <br />Loehr: <br />Johnson: <br />Wakefield: <br />Pipkorn: <br />advised his brother <br />against <br />not present <br />against <br />not sure .- abstain <br />against it on basis <br />not here <br />not here <br />and he are 100q in favor. <br />from voting <br />of what said here tonight. <br />not present , but against it <br />against <br />against <br />Lemberg asked if there were other questions. Mrs. Wakefield said <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.