CCMin_06Sep27 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

that the City endorses the group; however, a license provided by the City would have to be carried. Mayor Gehrz said that solicitors, peddlers, and resident's concerns about safety were the most common issues she hears about, and reiterated the importance of an ordinance regulating them. The council commenced in a brief discussion on their experiences with peddlers and solicitors coming to their door. Council member Lindstrom requested amending the end time from 8:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The council agreed that was a good suggestion. Council member Talbot added that if someone comes forward to challenge the end time, the council could re-examine. Administrator Miller stated any changes to the ordinance would result in major education through the City website, flyer, newsletter, and perhaps a newspaper article. Mayor Gehrz asked how different the Falcon Heights ordinance is from our neighboring cities. Staff will research. She added the best solution to avoid these groups is to put up a “no solicitors” sign on the door or simply do not answer the door to them. Staff will include the “no solicitors” sign in an upcoming newsletter for residents to use. Council member Lindstrom asked about Plymouth’s suspension and revocation section, Administrator Miller replied the provision for a hearing is included in that, but will clarify that section. He also said if the council’s intent were to suspend the license immediately upon a violation, he would have the City Attorney draft some language to insert in the ordinance. Council member Talbot asked about non-profit organizations license requirements. The council discussed this briefly, and staff explained that non-profit groups must also carry a charitable license with them issued by the City. The council discussed briefly the issue of ice cream trucks and where they fall under the ordinance. They decided to eliminate “ringing a bell” from section 1140.13. Administrator Miller was instructed to look into section 1140.01 and to research the party who is responsible for conducting the hearings. 2. Discussion of Alcohol Violation Fine Schedule Administrator Miller began by explaining the council had asked staff to review the fine schedule for alcohol violations. After conducting research on metro cities, Falcon Heights’s fine schedule was determined to be in-line with neighboring cities, Miller said. Mayor Gehrz stated that when the increasing penalty schedule was set, along with the minimum, it was because the council wanted to be sure there was a minimum penalty in place. Council member Talbot noted the maximum was outlined in the ordinance as well. He asked who imposes the penalty, and if there is a suspension of the license, when does that penalty begin. Administrator Miller replied that would be researched. Talbot also asked about the compounding of fines. Mayor Gehrz pointed out what was on the schedule was a minimum. Administrator Miller stated the code spells out the timeline of the fines, but the days of suspension are up to the council. Council member Lindstrom asked if the council would agree to change the fine for allowing an officer onto the premises to inspect a business. He thought the current fine was too low, and recommended $500 plus a one-day suspension. He said in other