CCMin_64Sep23 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

215l~ uncover the end of the stub to make sure it is where we think it is. The end of the stub was uncovered and we checked the elevation and found that the sbub was 6 - 62 feet below the street, The elevation there was about two feet higher than it might have been. He could have had it down there about two feet lower than it actually was. This wouldn't meet our needs at all. YYe didn't want to build there then. Brad came out and checked this. The result is that the Nodland Construction Company decided to lower the stub without any cost to rne. I have nothing to complain about. This is the situation that I think the Village Council ought to know about and I think the idea was that this fellow who re-laid the stub was supposed to check others along the street but no others were checked. ~e donut know how high those other stubs are. I think it is too bad that these stubs are not laid so as to take advantage of the full fall. I am about half way up and there certainly are a number of lots where the sewer depth is deeper. I was told that the contractor followed speci- fications - they probably did, but if they did, I think the specifications are wrong. You understand the point I am trying to make. ~, fall should be provided for - no more than they need so a home-owner can do what he wants. I don't know too much about sanitary sewers and that sort of thing, but the sewer line is on the east side of the water line - in other words the stub has to go past the water line. The water is about 18" above it. Lemberg: The sewer line was laid first. According to their records, they were very surprised about this. At their expense -they did redo this one, and checked another at the other end. Schwantes: chile they were checking, it would have been appropriate to check another lot where the stub could have been lowered. It seems that mine could be the only one. The hole is still open and I hope they take care of that soon. John Strait Are we on Fairview Avenue being assessed for any of the 1763 Fairview: Lindig Street improvements? Galvin: .The plat has been accepted, which plat leaves out the real estate of the home-owners on Fairview Avenue, since rRx, Lindig is being assessed 100 per cent. In the future if =;rou wish to obtain access to Lindig Avenue through the back half of your lot, an agreement has been executed which would permit you to acquire from Lindig, at a cost which would have been the assessment to you had you been a party to this improvement. This sets up an agreement for him to sell a strip which would allow him to get back the portion which he paid, which you would have paid had you participated, that is for having access to that street. You are not affected by this pro- ceeding, Nils ens Curb and gutter are entirely separate costs. There is no co-mingling with respect to those pro3ects. The cost to Lindig is X6.65 a front foot.