My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMin_65Jul14
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
196x
>
1965
>
CCMin_65Jul14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 8:38:41 AM
Creation date
6/22/2009 1:19:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> <br /> Lemberg: Part of the water flows to the east and part to the crest. <br /> General procedure is to take the water that flows at the <br /> front of the house. <br /> Questions This is a village project, why doesn't the village pay? <br /> Lemberg: Part is being paid by the Village - the part that comes <br /> off the streets. <br />Nilsen: This is a matter of benefits involved. South of Garden <br />there is a natural divide - drainage districts just don't <br />follow division lines. <br />George Anderson This should be a benefit to a11. At the end of Albert, <br />1775 Albert: every spring we have about two feat of water just because <br />the storm sewer doesn't work. <br />Lemberg: Since the county put in Larpenteur Avenue, the end of <br />Larpenteur is higher and the water cannot get into the sewer. <br />Bremer - representa- I merely wish to state that the county is interested in <br />tive of Ramsey this particular project. <br />Countys <br />Leonard Goedert The county may be interested in the sewer, but they are <br />1803 Simpson: not interested in Garden Avenue. <br />Kurt Rydberg You have had various discussions here - what I would like <br />1771 North Albert: to know is this district right south of me - when <br />Larpenteur went in, the county put in a storm sewer. It <br />seems to me the people living south of us won't need a <br />storm sewer and they live in Falcon Heights and their <br />children use the streets on the way to school. ~'Vhy <br />shouldn't they pay for some of this? 1Nhy can't it be done <br />on a village basis, so it wouldn't hit us so hard? <br />Nilsen: The Village has already picked up X13,000 for the cost of <br />that pumping station and Ramsey County Holding Pond - which <br />involved this drainage district. The village is also <br />contributing about X1.0,000 which will be picked up on <br />general taxes. You would have this situation only if we <br />could take the entire village and put storm sewer everywhere. <br />Every other community proceeds in this manner. <br />Tim Elder - Mr. MaclViillen talked about haw the church would benefit. <br />representative of In the two-and-one-half years since we built the parsonage, <br />Falcon Heights we have made every attempt to comply with stipulations with <br />Church: regard to the ponding area. We have been very much con- <br />cerned about the safety factor, the health hazard that <br />exists. We feel that storm sewer is the answer and the <br />church is prepared to pay its fair share on the same basis <br />as other property owners. <br />Harry Bruncke The lots on the east side of Albert - these are 300 feet <br />1710 Albert: deep. Looks like some street will be there in the future. <br />How would sewer enter into the picture there? Also sanitary <br />sewer and water. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.