My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMin_65Jul14
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
196x
>
1965
>
CCMin_65Jul14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 8:38:41 AM
Creation date
6/22/2009 1:19:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
226 ~ J~ ~~~ ~ <br />7 / <br />eliminate the water problem, it would cause a problem for someone <br />else. which is cheaper - to tear up the streets and regrade <br />or put in a lateral storm sevrer? <br />Lemberg: Regrading streets nrnv would be quite expensive.- grades <br />are set, boulevards are in, not to mention the grass, <br />driveways, manholes. It would run into a tremendous <br />lot of money. <br />Magnuson: Everyone is concerned about how much it is going to cost <br />him. As far as I am concerned, I am very much in favor <br />of the plan as proposed. <br />D. Crowe What do we do should Roseville not go along? I think the <br />1891 Albert: plan is inadequate. We should. be thinking of an alternate <br />plan. <br />Nilsens This hearing .could be continued. <br />Questions The people south of this district - what becomes of those <br />people. Are they going to pay eventually for a storm <br />sewer system? <br />Galvin: May I state first that when a building permit was issued <br /> to the church to extend. their parking lot, it was stipulated <br /> that the same volumetric area be maintained. People outside <br /> the district? Statutes hold that assessment can be against <br /> only those properties benefited. If those homes outside <br /> the area are not benefited, they could not be legally <br /> assessed for the improvement. It may happen they are in <br /> an area which will never be assessed for storm sewer. <br />Larsen: I distinctly informed many to stop this long enough to get <br /> another opinion or have our village engineer re-check the <br /> whole thing to make sure it would do the job .intended. <br />Hearing Continued Stone introduced the following resolution and moved its <br />to August 18, 1965: adoption: <br />WHEREAS, a resolution of the Village Council adopted <br />the 26th day of May, 1965 fixed a date for a council hearing <br />on the proposed improvement of <br />That portion of the Village of Falcon Heights bounded <br />by Roselawn Avenue, Snelling Avenue, Hemline Avenue <br />and Larpenteur Avenue by the construction of storm <br />sewer drainage area herafter called Improvement 65-1 <br />AND WHEREAS, said hearing originally scheduled for <br />June 3O was postponed by resolution of said council on <br />June 23, 1965 until. July 1l~, 1.965, and. <br />WHEREAS., ten days' published notice of the hearing <br />through two week7.y publications of the required notice was <br />given and the hearing was held thereon on the 1l~th day of <br />July 1965, at which time all persons desiring to be heard <br />were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, <br />NOW, THEREFORE., BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIZ OF THE <br />VILLAGE OF FALCON HEIGHTS: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.