CCMin_65Aug18_Special - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

J~~/~ 22so Black seconded the motion. Upon a vote being taken the following were in favor: Warkentien, Strandquist, Black and Stone; and the following were against the same: None. Whereupon the motion was carried. Continuation of PUBLIC HERRING Continuation of Public Heari•<ng on the Northeast Area Storm Sewer Improvement 65-1 was approved by resolution at the Northeast Area meeting of the council on July 1l~, 1965, therefore, Hearing Storm Sewer was called to order at 8:00 P.M. with approximately forty Improvement 65-1s persons present. Engineer Lemberg stated that since the meeting of July 11~, 1965, he has met with the Roseville engineer and other consulting engineers and each is in the process of re- computing estimated costs and working on various aspects of the project. It was stated that Roseville has not as yet had its first public hearing on this project. 1 Trustee Blacks Do they have any disagreements with our proposed plans? Lemberg: No. One thing though, by running up Holton rather than Albert, it is more expensive but that extra cost does not 8ffect this Village. E. M. MacMillan Mr. Mac~Jiillen explained this his committee had sent letter 1776 Holton: to all residences in the area involved and received replies as follows: !t3 were opposed to storm sewer pro3ect. 35 were opposed to the pro3ect unless the physical plan is revised to reduce the cost to individuals involved. 32 would petition to abandon present plan in its entirety and erect xoas~-wire fence around the present ponding area between Holto}i and Pascal Avenues at Garden. 30 were in favor of Northeast Area Storm Sewer Pro3ect as proposed. He then turned over envelope containing the replies to the acting mayor for review. 1 R. H. Chalmers How did this pro3ect originate? 18811 No. Pascals This was started in 1956 or 1957 when the council requested Lemberg3 the consulting engineers to study the problem and draw up some plans, which they did. In the last couple years, there has been considerable discussion and during the spring of 1965, the council felt that the people should b® given an opportunity to look at this, As the present consulting engineers, our firm concurred with the plans as previously prepared. Some small revisions were made, and in some cases we decreased the size of pipe. This plan was designed for a general water fall, not a flood. The entire plan has again been reviewed by Bannister, engineering firm for Roseville, and they have gone through the entire plan and computations and have concurred with the design.