My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMin_66Jun8
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
196x
>
1966
>
CCMin_66Jun8
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 8:46:29 AM
Creation date
6/22/2009 1:54:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
23 78 <br />Lemberg: We will reshape the gutter here both ways. <br />Blacks Will the gutter be much deeper. <br />Lemberg: It will be cut down so it will drain down. We want to <br />reshape the gutters further back,too,and we expect to get <br />a normal six inch curb, also so that we have a crown on the <br />street. <br />Nilsens Suppose Mr. Mock developed the back of his lot, where <br />would the water go? <br />Mocks It would go to Liedholm~s driveway. It is lc~w~®r. <br />Nilsens I am concerned about the water in the spring. <br />Bruneke: We would like to see you reshape the gutters so that we <br />have a natural crown and natural boulevard section instead <br />of one higher than the boulevard. <br />Warren Hansen We have a lot of water - almost a lake, and there is 3ust a <br />1757 No. Alberts little too much water for the birds to drink. <br />Warkentien: We have continual depressing of the streets in front of the <br /> Shell Station. Shouldn't we go beyond - where we can reach <br /> all the water. The big puddle is always in front of the <br /> empty lots there. <br />Lemberg: It is cheaper and better to reshape the gutters than to lay <br /> six inch pipe all the way. The catch basins will be lower <br /> than what they are naro~. <br />Warkentiens Let's be sure the drainage Sob is done well enough. <br />Brunekes What is the possibility of the county paying for this? <br />Nilsens I doubt that they would pay for anything of this nature. The <br /> County has adopted a nevi policy about all of their roads and <br /> I doubt very much they would pay any of this. <br />Whaleys The county should have been held responsible for stopping <br /> the flow. <br />Nilsens As far as the cost - there will not be lE~ assessment. The <br />street is involved here, too, but the council would not want <br />to state at this time what the proportion of assessment <br />would be. <br />Whaleys I bought 1~2 lo~.ds of dirt brought in to get up to Larpenteur <br />Avenue level. My property is high enough ncsw so I don't get <br />much water. That water doesn't come from the street, it <br />comes from east of us. A11 we would have to do is run a <br />dike down the back end of our lots and let Hamline Avenue <br />keep their water over there. <br />Gene Piche Regarding the method of assessment. It is ~' assumption that <br />1758 .A.7-bens the improvement would be paid for 100 by the abutting <br />property owners on Albert. The drainage problem is not on <br />the deeper lots. I am a little curous for the differential <br />assessment for the deeper lots as opposed to the Larpenteur <br />Avenue lots. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.