Laserfiche WebLink
1195 <br />Otis I'm not coming out in favor of apartments, but I think it has been <br />shown that if these people move across the line into P~oseville, it <br />will cost us just as much. <br />Nilsen Does anyone on the cour_cil have a question they wish to ask a_t:thbs <br />particular time? Is there any informa tion you may want to seek? <br />Is there any citizen of Falcon Heights who has anything further he <br />wishes to add this evening? Arty residdnt? Anyone who appears on the <br />petition? Is there anyone who wants to add anything to the testimony <br />v~re have presently. <br />Atty. Unfortunately, at the time I spoke a few minutes ago, the question of <br />Tilton apartmen is was not before the house. It now appears that the pro- <br />ponents of the rezong state quite clearly that the purpose of the <br />rezoning is for the purpose of opposing the apartments. They rec- <br />ognize that leaving a small strip of commercial would be just a guise, <br />sort of a bone to the owner, and that they recognize arty commercial <br />project, be it at this time or some Future time, would require at <br />least the full amount of land the owner has zoned commercial, so <br />in view of that recognition and in view of their statement that they <br />would want to again rezone this property commercial, from which they <br />are taking away the commercial status, when the right kind of project <br />came in, I think we have nothing left to discuss but our apartment <br />building. First of all I want to point out that the present plans call <br />for four buildings comprising 68 units -- 17 units each. tie have <br />attempted to comply with every single requirement put down in the <br />PJilsen Do you have an objection, I~4r. Korstad? <br />horstad- - Yes, we object on the same basis as we did before. If we wanted to <br />open this up into apartment buildings, our whole presentation would <br />be changed. <br />Tilton With reference to rezoning, the question is relevant insofar as we <br />have the type of development that this village should look for on <br />this property. I certainly, representing a vested interest, rep- <br />resenting a man who wants to build these apartments, a man who has <br />built many apartment houses in the area, I am not going to tell you <br />people here what is in your own best interests. I do know that ~Zr. <br />Loecks has been an expert planner for many years and I was very in- <br />terested in the report that he made in which he pointed out that you <br />are not going to have shopping centers up and down Larpenteur Avenue. <br />As a matter of fact, you a;~e ~ oing to have to have something to <br />support these shopping centers because this is the basis of your <br />hard, cold, tax base. That strip of shopping cen ters over there and <br />the people who shop there that give that tax dollar some reality. <br />I would like to point out that in an apartment type development, <br />the statistics will show that there are 2.7 people per unit -- that's <br />people not children, and a half child ner unit is somewhere around <br />35 children. I would also like to point out that these people will <br />shop and. spend their dollars in this very area. <br />I~4ore important than that, I think we <br />about this man's rising taxes. This <br />just about all of us no matter which <br />to face the rising tax problem on ou <br />villages around you, of much Brea+.er <br />ments in the same school district. <br />can't avoid the very question <br />is a real problem confronting <br />community we live in. We have <br />r home, and the fact that the <br />size, are putting these develop- <br />I don't know for sure if my figures are accurate. If they are, I <br />