My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMin_60Jun9
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
196x
>
1960
>
CCMin_60Jun9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2009 4:36:38 PM
Creation date
6/22/2009 4:50:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
132 <br />Schmelz Nilsen moved that the Hearin- be continued until 9:30, June 15th. <br />B:ezoning Seconded by Shavor a.nd c~~rried, <br />Falcon Heights Treasurer Wm. E. Olsen reported T!!r. Sanford of the Falcon Heip_hts <br />State Bank State Bank called and told him they would like to reinvest the <br />Securities securities they are holding to guarantee the Falcon Heights <br />Bank Account in something that would pay them a greater return <br />and the Deputy Clerk was instructed to get the receipt out of <br />the Safety Deposit Box and give it to ?~Zr. Sanford. The guaran- <br />tee will remain the same. <br />Streets Graham reported on Bonestroo's letter regard~:ng~-. some settling <br />of streets over sewer lines. Graham will check further with <br />Bonestroo. <br />Hermes' Nilsen reported on developments and Attorney Graham said it was <br />Business his opinion that it was a private matter between the owners of <br />Block the business property and the residents. It does not involve <br />the Council. <br />Vacation alley At this point, mayor Nilsen recessed the regular meeting to <br />Johnson Peti- hold a special hearing on the vacation of the 20' platted alley <br />tion which runs from Pascal to Holton approximately 125' north of <br />Larpenteur, as petitioned by Norman L. Johnson and others. <br />R4ayor Nilsen read notices as published and posted, <br />Norman John- Besides the original petitioners, I have gotten the names of <br />son. various neighbors up and down the street in support of the <br />vacation. He submitted a paper reading as follows: "6"+e the <br />undersigned are in favor of closing the alley between Holton <br />and Pascal Rvenues as the alley is of no consequent need; <br />Paper was signed by lit residents. <br />At the time the alley was designa±ed in the original plat, it <br />was thought the area would be semi-commercial. It didn't develop <br />that way. It is entirely residential. The petition for vacation <br />has been signed by 100% of the abutting property owners. The <br />alley isn't suitable for vehicular traffic. Vdhen it is muddy, <br />cars get stuck in there. A Tr;lephone Truck kept us awake half <br />of one night trying to get out. <br />Coppini This matter has come up before. It is a sore spot, and, in my <br />opinion, should never have been used as a thoroughfare. The <br />Village has not spent any money on it. <br />Nilsen The Village doesn't keep up any alleys until they have first been <br />brought up to specifications by the adjoining property ovmers. <br />Shavor I think we should put posts in there. <br />Johnson I was told that could not be done. Therefore, I favor the only <br />other alternative - vacation. <br />Shavor If it were blocked off to motor traffic, would you take care of <br />it then? <br />Johnson Do you mean 3ust put posts across it? I think there might be a <br />legal responsibility in case of accident. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.