My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMin_60Jun15_Special
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
196x
>
1960
>
CCMin_60Jun15_Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2009 4:35:13 PM
Creation date
6/22/2009 4:59:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1i~46 <br />"'i?ckelson I vivant to clarify the reason some of these questions vrerc <br />raised. ~~Ihat if in another three years vve find the only <br />way the whole village vrill be cleared is to install a vrhole <br />system of stone sewers? You say the only feasible vray is t: - <br />ge+~ one drainage district a+. a time. ~ventual.ly, will ^nre <br />have to put in storm sewers and spend even more money? Is <br />this really permanent or temporary? I am for Netting this <br />drainage the best vray we can. Is it feasible to look at the <br />whole Village? <br />~onestroo First of all, there is no ruestion in my mind. but vrhat <br />either of the plans presented will take care of the problem <br />in this sub-district. 'e":'hen this problem is solved., it is <br />solved. The enti re Village has been generally solved., ~°:`e <br />know pretty yell where the v,~ater in the entire Village will <br />run. In this particular case, it is specific. It is going <br />to drain as proposed at this hearing. If, in the fut~zre, <br />there are any other assessments for drainage, you will be <br />excluded. A plan has been made for the drainage and. vve a.re <br />just going through a phase of it. ~'.~e have studied the over- <br />all plan; and for this particular area .have been able to <br />make a more economical and practical solution. l~,'e would <br />like to put in a decent base on Arona. Llanystreets do not <br />have a. decent base. Samples showed as high as 53: silt. 'r'ye <br />are not allowed to go over 10;~. t,~e do have a plan for this <br />area, y,re are pulling away from this plan just a little. Vie <br />have to put in a 12'f sub-cut on 1~rona. t'~e may have to get <br />more and we may not. <br />P!Iikkelson Then this will not have to be undone? <br />Bonestroo Ido. It is rather confusing to me to come to a meeting and <br />find a petition against a plan that hasn't even been <br />presented -- something on ;°~~hich nobody had complete information. <br />Landis Isn't this substantially the same thing as two years aA_o? <br />3onestroo No, it is ``°8,000. cheaper. <br />Nilsen The engineers have been able to make this redaction by planning <br />to cut Down on the amount of storm sewer and take care of some <br />of the drainage ~~ grading, <br />Cannon 'iShen the drainage on Simpson vrent to Pastcal, there was no <br />trouble. Can't Famsey County be held responsible for ruining <br />Crawford? <br />Shavor Is there anyone here interested in draining Simpson? <br />"irs. Kjeldsen.I believe vre ha-e a problem today, I would like to improve my <br />1688 Arona property but have been told I cannot until the drainage problem <br />is solved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.