CCMin_60Jun15_Special - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

lt~t~8 R. Keyes These boundary lines are. then set as of the moment? `then, 1725 Arona if a policy decision is made to define the cost of any surface water removal, the rate is set? In the future, we will not be assessed for the cost of draining any o+.,her district? 'basically, I think the Council is faced with a policy decision, namely, are you Being to do something about an alleged problem or not? You have heard a lot of testimony from people here and from the engineer so it is up to you to make some decision on it. °1r. Spahn, I thinks is on the right track. '='.Te know that long-range planning is on. V, e are talking simply about removal of surface water. One way is by storm sewer and the other is by run-off. One is a ditch and the other is curbing at the edges of the street. I think you have to go back to the engineer and the council and decide on the basis of footage. You will have to tiveigh in terms of this and in several districts, and it does involve money. You have got the problem, take the evidence and go back and make a. decision about this thing. Only the. engineer can settle these problems about what is best and. most practical. Schmidt Does the alternative plan involve putting in curbs? Bonestroo No, there would. have to be a petition along Arona for this, Nilsen V~hat is the plan along the boulevard section? Bonestroo It will remain the same as it is now. Nilsen ate have tried to get the ideas of people who have raised their hands. Is there anyone else wishing to be heard? Peterson ~P~ill a catch basin be the answer? He is the first engineer that h:as` admitted that Larpenteur is higher than Crawford. Nilsen '~V`e have to work this out. The alternate elan is entirely new to the Council. a";e asked Bonestroo to come in with a permanent, sensible plan. I realize you want the Council to proceed and that you want something that is not going to have to be done over and. over again. As far as I could observe, it is largely a drainage problem. It looks like it might be somewhere around the 75q property owner, Village 25% basis. tiaarkentien I move that we continue this hearing to June ?_lst at 7:00 P. ':~'. Resolution ~~otion seconded by Utecht and carried. Atty. Friel The fact that the street is being reconstructed is incidental to the drainage problem. For that reason, I cannot see from any standpoint, that there is any basis for separating this into drainage on hand hand and street on the other. Rezoning Lee- Schmelz Bros. John Yngve, tittorney, reviewed Sch~aelz brothers' re~uest for rezonin of the Lee P d t d g roper y an requFste a decision.