My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMin_60Jun15_Special
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
196x
>
1960
>
CCMin_60Jun15_Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2009 4:35:13 PM
Creation date
6/22/2009 4:59:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
il~44 <br />that could be held against the contractors who did the <br />work previously'? The people vsho rebuilt the road evidently <br />did not restore it to its previous condition. is there any <br />way they could be held responsible? <br />Nilsen I think the bond expired a year ago, The work was accepted. <br />t,4ikkelson If they are not liable, then is it possible to make this job <br />part of the over-all plan for the whole Village? Perhaps <br />we can correct the drainage of the whole Village, make it a <br />part of the future system, and assess everyone for it. <br />Bonestroo The Village has been divided into Drainage Districts. There <br />has been considerable money spent for surveys, anal the prob- <br />lems in each community are different. Why don't we put this <br />on general taxes? One of the reasons is that there •re many <br />drainage problems throughout the Village. The ditch solution <br />on Ruggles is not a good permanent solution. I do feel th?t <br />if you are going to throw this on general taxes, then when <br />we do ~-:pork elsewhere, you are going to be assessed for it <br />over there. <br />ti'J:3rkentien If we put this on general taxes and improve the whole village, <br />think tivhat the taxes will be. One main point - we knew of <br />the trouble on Simpson at the ±.ime we accepted the sewer. <br />About 15 of us vrent over the Village Streets one Oaturday. <br />We were not satisfied that all .had been done that could have <br />been done. V~~e had no alternative but to accent the opinion <br />of the engineer. ti'~e did the best we could at the time, I <br />have ultimate confidence that what ?~tr. Bonestroo ?proposes <br />at this time is the best solution. <br />Nilsen When you try to spread the cost over the whole Villas-e, what <br />do you get? A little job here and a little job there. tine <br />finally have gotten -to the position where we can program this <br />work. <br />? 1526 <br />Crawford There is a big hole in our garage that is filled with hater. <br />Last summer, there were three or four children playing in <br />the mud in front of my home, and the water wa.s stagnant. This <br />is a problem. All of us want the work done but in a more <br />economical manner. <br />Alilsen I have about six pages from the Hering about tyro years ago <br />where it ~Aras pointed out that everyone who builds a home, <br />blacktops a drive, or puts in side-walks adds to the problem - <br />even if he is situated on a high dry hill, by decreasing the <br />natural a'~sorption and. increasing the run-off. <br />L. 3ratsch You talk about the area on Crawford and Simpson, the assess- <br />178l~ Simpson ment line runs just across me. 1lhat about the people on <br />Pascal? Every year they have work done on the_r stree's. <br />Aren't they going to be assessed? <br />Bonestroo That h?s been set up as a separate district. <br />3ratsch Two years ago they were excluded because they had natural <br />drainage out to Larnenteur. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.