Laserfiche WebLink
1b77 <br />Dahlgren: The Eastern portion of the Villas-e has been well developed <br />as you a.ll knovr. The property from Arona to Pascal ha.s been rezoned from commer- <br />cial to multiple as it has primarily been developed. There has ben a tremendous <br />dema~for apartments in the last few years. Frequently land used for apartments <br />is worth more than commercial. This is not alvrays true but it is sometimes true. <br />We expect that market to ~rAW. young people and elderly people are moving into <br />apartments. Vre expect that in time some of the duplexes that have been built in <br />this section will be replaced with apartments. The property at Hamline and <br />Larpenteur has been zoned B-l, used as a Duffer between single family developments <br />and commercial. The pas station across the corner has been zoned B-2. The land <br />in the t~LE~ South and East of the shopping center was not zoned commercial because <br />it is felt that, should it be necessary to expand the parking area, this should be <br />handled as a "Conditional" use permit in single family areas. This enables the <br />Villa<^e to attach whatever conditions they want to that Hermit which gives a higher <br />degree of control. You can specify fencing, type, landscaping, surfacing, etc. <br />1+Qayor Nilsen; Is there anyone who has a question? <br />?,tr. Tschirley, 1505 I own a lot at Pascal and Larpenteur and I think it is <br />Highland Pkway. 50 x 130. Th'hat could I build on that corner? <br />Dahlgren: An Apartment. <br />Tschirley: Could it face either Pascal or La »penteur? <br />Dahlgren: It could face either direction but it has to be set back <br />30' from the street. Where we have existing platted lots and these lots are perhaps <br />not as large as we vrould like them to '~e, the ?'lapping Commission and Council has <br />the authority to issue a variance. Come in with a preliminary sketch showing what <br />you propose as to building, location, etc., and the Planning Commission and Council <br />will review it and may make some suggestions regarding narking, set-backs, etc. <br />n~2ayor Nilsen: I was asked what the plans were for the property North of <br />Ruggles, Vtest of Hamline. Tha±, property is within single family residential zoning <br />as is all property outside of the heavily lined areas. <br />Cartwright: I vrant to point out that there is a rezoning North of the <br />Shell Station on Albert. ti"te changed it from single family to two family. It <br />swings ?round and covers the corner of Holton and Albert too and North on Holton. <br />i~dayor Nilsen called for questions from people interested in property 'Test of <br />Snelling. <br />Labalestra asked why the line was not, the same depth all the way through. <br />P.Rayor Nilsen: Tate have the very nice residdntial district immediately back <br />of the restaurant there and I think we must recognize some of the limitations we <br />do have in Falcon Heights as pointed out by ?rir. Cartwright and bar. Dahlgren. Hovrard, <br />may I have your comments? In other words, Labalestra would propose the enlargement <br />of the ff-2 zone to straighten out vrith the X3-1 going back to the R-3. <br />Dahlgren: If the use of the property was only for parking, it wouldn't <br />require rezoning. You would hate to acquire the property and then ask for a con- <br />ditional use permit. The conditions might be pretty rough inasmuch as the Council <br />would be concerned about protecting these homes. I think it would be wrong to <br />rezone them now because it would put a cloud on the value of those properties for <br />