Laserfiche WebLink
1681 <br />standing that that was seriously considered. <br />Fenske: This was a very tentative plan. The Legislature is not <br />very enthusiastic about Student Housing. <br />Cartwright: Dean Fenske, I would like to comment on two remarks you <br />made. For instance, your reference to the pre-existing non-conforming use regula- <br />tions. ~'Te did not intend, in drafting this ordinance, that the pre-existing, non- <br />conforming use regulations apply to the University. The Planning Commission would <br />not recom-mend the enforcement of the nre-existing, non-conforming use regulations. <br />The second point I ti°rould like to make is the likelihood that our regulations under <br />this Public Institution District, the likelihood that those would be enforc~ble may <br />ultimately be a matter for the Courts. The purpose for putting that in there was <br />that we felt we should make an attempt to protect the ~orivate property owners from <br />any unfavorable use tha±, might be made of nearby University land. For instance, <br />we wouldn't want you to but a tannery in next to a private home, and as you know, a few <br />years ago there was objection to a stadium. Those are the reasons we put it in, <br />and we hope that whatever land use you propose will be agreeable to those citizens <br />affected. <br />Fenske: Let me assure you we ti^rant to cooperate with the citizens of <br />the Village. 'ost of them ?re our neighbors or our employees. <br />"airs. James Jenkins, In showing this map to members of the League of Y+Tomen Voters, <br />2190 Folwell: we felt that having B-1 or B-lA on University land is mis- <br />leading and that it should be PI and then perhaps an adendum saying "If the University <br />releases land, this is what the map would look like.tr <br />Cartwright: Howard, could you cross-hatch that land to show that it be- <br />longs to the University? <br />Dahlgrens Yes, we could do that on the map. This map will be a reference <br />map that will be available here at the Village Hall for anyone interested in land <br />anywhere in the Village. The Village could use the original land use map which goes <br />even further than the map vre are discussing but indicates that if this land should <br />be released for private development, this would be the land use proposed. The Village <br />can adopt such a land use plan. This puts the Village on record that this is their <br />intent Vrith regard to future uses without zoning it. At least that gives the prospec- <br />tive buyer of University property or any other property, the contemplated use of the <br />land over a long period of time. <br />Dean '4acey: It seems to me that it would clarify the matter if the Univer- <br />sity Land were to be marked as P-1 and then vrith notations stating that if the land <br />were to become private property, it is intended that the Village had in mind that it <br />would be zoned in these categories. Anyone picking up the map now would infer that <br />the zoning as shovan would indicate that this is the use to vrhich the land will be put <br />from now on. <br />Cartwrights I would like to ask the Attorney what our position would be <br />tonight if we changed proposed zoning of the University property to include all <br />University property as Public Institution. <br />Galvin: The problem we are trying to solve is one of mis-leading the <br />