Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />FEBRUARY 26, 1986 <br />PAGE 4 <br />Due to this, and the fact the bonds have been issued, the project must get <br />underway as soon as possible, and the development agreement amended. <br />Kubitsehek explained that their plans have been altered for construction <br />on the Hawkins Property and the value of the project will actually be <br />$200,000 more than originally indicated for the project including the <br />property at 2061 W. Larpenteur, and reviewed the changes. The developers <br />would like to continue to negotiate with the owners of the Larpenteur <br />property, however if they are unable to eonsumate a purchase within six <br />months the City could then consider condemnation, the developers would <br />purchase the property from the City, and reimburse for any costs to the <br />City. Van de North and Barnes recommended that the development agreement <br />be amended to reflect the changes. The Planning Commission will be <br />informed of the changes and the City Planner will be asked to review the <br />site plan. Following the discussion Baldwin moved, seconded by Ciernia, <br />that Resolution R-86-10 be adopted amending the development agreement. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />RESOLUTION R-86-10 <br />A RESOLUTION RELATING TO REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR STRATFORD <br />LTD. FOR HAWKINS PROPERTY <br />CHANGE ORDER AND REQUEST FOR PAYMENT FOR LARPENTEUR/COFFMAN/TATUM <br />IMPROVEMENTS <br />Sehunieht reviewed the change order request for Larpenteur/Coffman/Tatum <br />utility and street improvements, a copy of which is on file in the Clerkts <br />Office. He explained that the change order and resulting price increase <br />was due to unforseen problems encountered, the work has been done, and <br />recommended approval of the change order and payment of $33,717.25. <br />Council briefly discussed whether or not there is a way in which to be <br />more exact on specifications, after which Chenoweth moved, seconded by <br />Hard, that the change order be approved, and payment be made to Austin P. <br />Keller Construction Co. in the amount of $33,717.25. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br />RESOLUTION R-86-11 RELATING TO MSA STREET MAINTENANCE FUNDS <br />Barnes explained that the engineering firm did not submit the request for <br />MSA street maintenance funds before the deadline, and is now recommending <br />the proposed resolution be adopted and referred to the State Aid office <br />for consideration. Hard moved, seconded by Ciernia, that Resolution <br />R-86-11 be adopted. Motion carried unanimously. <br />RESOLUTION R-86-11 <br />A RESOLUTION REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM CURRENT MUNICIPAL <br />STATE AID STANDARDS <br />RESOLUTION R-86-12 RELATING TO TAX REFORM ACT OF 1985 <br />Council briefly discussed a proposed resolution `submitted and recommended <br />by Fiscal Consultant Steve Apfelbaeher, after which Baldwin moved, <br />seconded by Ciernia, that Resolution R-86-12 be adopted. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br />