Laserfiche WebLink
~~ <br />Ross Peterson 1426 VPest Larpenteur, said he used to li ve in Los Angeles and <br />had done work in the engineering field. He said that no group <br />should attempt to prevent progress, and that when residents in <br />this area bought properti es they should have checked into things <br />more carefully. <br />James C. Kelly 1386 West Larpenteur, said he purchased his property in 1947 <br />and that he knew at the time the Keller property was zoned <br />commercial. Asked if he was not correct in saying that Larpenteur <br />avenue has been designated a Federal aid highway. He said the <br />character of Larpenteur will change considerably and that it will <br />be a through route for heavy traffic with no highway to the north <br />or south that can handle this heavy traffic adequately. Mr. Kelly <br />stated that rezoning this property is a secondary consideration <br />because the character of the neighborhood will be changed by heavy <br />traffic going over Larpenteur. <br />with the <br />R.N. Featherston 1867 N. Simpson, said he definitely feels that~Larpenteur Avenue <br />development going through that the Keller property should remain <br />in its commercial status. 6s to devaluing residential properties, <br />he referred to a similar situation in Buffalo where property values <br />were benefited, that such properti es did not remain residential but <br />were sold for commercial purposes. Said the petition should be <br />turned down and the property left commercial. <br />Walter H. ~estman 1382 West Larpenteur, said he has three small children and that he <br />thought it would be better with an open filling station on the <br />corner as far as hazards to children are concerned. Stated he <br />has no ob3ection to a filling station on this dorner. <br />Clarence Rekstad 1790 N. Pascal stated as to being concerned about childrens' <br />safety that if you could see all the kids that cross Larpenteur <br />to buy candy bars at Keller's store, including four and five-year <br />olds, the people would realize this is much more of a hazard than <br />a filling station. <br />Mayor Henry The Mayor then asked the petitioners if they wished to say anything <br />further . <br />L. T. Gas ink questioned that residential property in the area would stand to <br />gain if sold for commercial purposes, and asserted that commercializing <br />the area. is going to reduce home owners' property values. <br />James White said that he believesRekstad's and Weatherston's statements should <br />be disregarded as t hs proposed service station does not affect them <br />at all. <br />Mr. Piret 1795 IV'. Larpenteur, said he was not interested in the amount of <br />traffic on Larpenteur from the standpoint of their four .small children, <br />o but felt that traffic out of a filling station is going to increase <br />traffic on Albert, making it dangerous for their children and for . <br />other peoples' children. <br />Pdrs. Magney 1758 N. Albert, asked i f chances for regulating speed lima is in <br />the area would be better if the district is zoned residential. <br />