Laserfiche WebLink
L) <br />Eureka Fire Hose Division, D.J. YYoll, distributor <br />500 ft. 22" Eureka double jacket white fire hose, X1.62 per ft. <br />With heavy duty bronze rocker lug <br />type couplings attached. <br />~eab pressure per sq. inch, 400 lbs. <br />Certified check for ~~s=° <br />Forstner Bros., A.R. Williams, field engineer <br />500 ft. d.j. fire hose Fi re Underwriters approved, tested 400 lbs., <br />rocker lug couplings, Universal Brand, $1,33 per ft. <br />Alternate hose bid - <br />Fyre Fyter brand -full moulded rubber interlining <br />Fyr Flex Brand, per ft. $1.48 <br />Fyr Fyter " " " 1.31 <br />Dayton " " " 1.24 <br />tested 400 lbs. <br />Certified check for $20.00 <br />Viessrs. F.G. Hodges, representing Minnesota Fire Equipment Company; <br />Joseph duel, of the Hewitt Rubber Division, and D.J. Woll, of the <br />Eureka Fire Hose Company, were heard in turn with respect to fire <br />hose offered by their respective firms. <br />Take fire Stewart then moved that the council take the bids under advisement <br />hose bids for consideration and decision at a later date. Shavor seconded <br />under advise- and motion carried. <br />ment. <br />hSock Rezoning It was agreed by the council to have a discussion of matters <br />petition relating to the rezoning request and the property involved. <br />Trustee Shavor opened the discussion by stating he had viewed the property and <br />that it is definitely residential at present. He read the following <br />statement from an opinion of the County Attorney, James F. Lynch, <br />dated February 9, 1948, relative to zoning of property: <br />1 <br />1 <br />"The power of a Village to rezone property is based upon its <br />police po,~rers which may be exercised only when necessary for the <br />safety, health, morals and general welfare of the Village as a <br />whole, ang~ any owner holds his real property subject to su ch action <br />as will not interfere with the rights of others or the public <br />interests or requirements. The legal problem of zoning is to <br />reconcile the uses or private property with the public welfare, <br />or to harmonize its use by the owner with regulations, restrictions <br />and prohibitions essential to safeguard the rights of the community <br />a3 a whole. Restriction of the owner's rights in the use of his <br />property is allowable on the ground of public necessity, not mere <br />desire, expediency or convenience, and must be reasonable, non- <br />discriminatory, uniform and enacted on good faith and in the public <br />interest." <br />Shavor pointed out that the zoning of this parcel does not <br />conform to all of these requirements. Ha also pointed out that this <br />is spot zoning which is not recommended by professional planners and <br />