My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda_04Dec8
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda Packets
>
200x
>
2004
>
CCAgenda_04Dec8
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 2:14:14 PM
Creation date
6/24/2009 4:41:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• FALCON HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br />November 10, 2004 <br />MnDOT Maintenance Resolution (continued) <br />-8- <br />Administrator Worthington said the resolution represents a new effort by multiple cities, to draw <br />MnDOT's attention to this problem. The City of Fridley hopes to convene a meeting between <br />several suburban mayors and the Governor, sometime in early 2005 before the legislative <br />session. They are also recommending that the cities who participate in this effort send a packet <br />of information to their legislative delegation. <br />A brief discussion followed. <br />RESOLUTION 2004-23 <br />Talbot moved adoption of Resolution 2004-23 requesting that MnDOT conduct regular <br />maintenance of their rights of way within City limits. The motion was unanimously approved. <br />2005 Tree Removal Contract Extension <br />Administrator Worthington said that typically the city takes proposals for tree removals annually. <br />Since these are under the $50,000 statutory competitive bidding cap, the city is not required to <br />. bid these contracts: Tree trimming takes place in the winter, when trees are largely dormant. <br />The City currently has a contract for 2004 with S & S Tree Service for tree removals. The <br />trimming contract is a separate contract. S & S has offered to honor their 2004 pricing in 2005, <br />provided that we do not solicit any new proposals for 2005. With increased fuel costs for <br />companies with large fleets, as well as some difficulty in the past in getting proposals from <br />reputable companies, it makes sense to extend the removal contract for one more year. In <br />addition, staff has received many favorable comments about the quality of S & S's work, and <br />they have provided an excellent response to emergency call-out, routine removals, and special <br />situations, including our Dutch Elm season. Staff reviewed this proposal with the city attorney, <br />and there are no legal impediments to a one-year extension to the contract. Staff is currently <br />researching better, more competitive ways to solicit proposals for the tree contract, and in 2005, <br />will recommend that the city combine the tree trimming and removal contracts into one request <br />for proposals. <br />A brief discussion followed. <br />Council member Lamb commented that while he recognizes S & S is probably giving the City a <br />price break for 2005 and the contract with them is under the $50,000 statutory competitive <br />bidding cap, he would prefer the City bid out all contracts on principle, to ensure the City's <br />taxpayers are getting the biggest bang for the buck. <br />Council member Talbot said that he talked with City Forester Anita Twaroski and she told him <br />that Dutch elm disease is running rampant through the metro area, requiring the removal of large <br />• numbers of trees at additional cost to each community. Also, gas is going up. He would vote <br />to accept S & S's offer for 2005. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.