My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCMin_94Mar28
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
199x
>
1994
>
PCMin_94Mar28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2009 2:46:08 PM
Creation date
6/25/2009 11:09:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• MINUTES <br />REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MARCH 28, 1994 <br />7 P.M. <br />PRESENT ABSENT <br />Tom Brace Kay Andrews <br />Lee Barry Wendy Treadwell <br />Paul Kuettel <br />Ken Salzberg <br />Lisa Lampi (arrived at 7:30) <br />ALSO PRESENT <br />Susan Hoyt, Administrator <br />Sam Jacobs, City Council Liaison <br />Phil Carlson, Planning Consultant <br />Meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Chairperson Barry. <br />Minutes of the February 28, 1994 we approved as written. <br />REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO CHAPTER 9-4.01 SUBDIVISION (4) OF <br />FIFTEEN FEET THREE INCHES (15'-3") TO THE REQUIRED THIRTY FOOT REAR <br />YEAR SETBACK, AND TO CHAPTER 9-2.04 SUBDIVISION 1(c) OF TWO FEET <br />THREE INCHES (2'3") TO THE REQUIRED FIVE FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK <br />• FOR 1775 ASBURY STREET. <br />Hoyt briefly reviewed the February 28 planning commission recommendation <br />regarding the request for a variance at 1775 Asbury by property owners, Mr. <br />and Mrs. Wiger. She said that the commission requested that the Wigers revise <br />their proposed construction plans by expanding their house into the sideyard <br />rather than further into the rearyard. This would require a less substantial <br />variance request than the one submitted. <br />Mrs. Wiger explained that no new plans were submitted because it would not <br />be financially feasible to expand into the sideyard and she understood that any <br />revisions should go in this direction. And they would like to have their original <br />variance request reexamined and approved. <br />The Olsons, of 1780 Snelling Drive, to the rear of 1775 Asbury, said they <br />objected because of the proximity to their rear yard and the possible invasion of <br />their privacy. <br />A discussion followed regarding the impact that the addition of a two story <br />home 14 feet from the rearyard would have on the adjacent property at 1780 <br />N. Snelling Drive. The commission also discussed the fact that the Wiger <br />• property is not unusually small in area, that there are other blocks configured in <br />the same manner in Falcon Heights, and that there is space to expand into the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.