Laserfiche WebLink
appraisal on whether the other five surrounding property values <br />• were affected. <br />The motion died for lack of a second. <br />C. Kuettel moved to grant all variances as needed for the 988 sq. <br />foot garage based upon the findings. <br />C. Lampi seconded the motion. <br />C. Salzberg asked that the condition that the structure not be <br />rebuilt if it were over 50$ destroyed be added. <br />Discussion on this specific condition followed. <br />Mr. Brace was asked if he would hold the city harmless from any <br />damages if he was granted the variances. He said he could not <br />respond to that question because he was only prepared to seek <br />assurances for thier four car garage. <br />Chairperson Barry asked for further discussion. <br />C. Boche asked for a roll call vote. <br />C. Andrews aye <br />C. Barry nay <br />• C. <br />C. Boche <br />Huso aye <br />nay <br />C. Kuettel aye <br />C. Lampi aye <br />C. Salzberg nay <br />Chair Barry stated that the necessary variances for a 988 sq. <br />foot garage passed by a 4 to 3 vote based upon stated findings. <br />And that the planning commission would be recommending the <br />granting of the variances to the city council. <br />A motion was made to extend the planning commission meeting <br />beyond 10 p.m. Unanimously approved. <br />REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A VARIANCE_AT 2097 FOLWELL AVENUE <br />In May, 1992, the planning commission approved a variance for <br />a sideyard setback for a proposed new home at 2097 Folwell. This <br />variance granted a 1 1/2 foot variance in the eastside lot line <br />for the northeastern rear five feet of the structure. A surveyor <br />on the job called attention to the fact that the required <br />sideyard setback is not 5 feet on this property, but 20$ of the <br />lot width (21', 4") because the property abuts an existing public <br />right-of-way. The five foot setback requirement is for property <br />abutting residential property. <br />• <br />