My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda_03Oct1_wksp
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda Packets
>
200x
>
2003
>
CCAgenda_03Oct1_wksp
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2009 9:35:30 AM
Creation date
6/25/2009 4:32:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • In 2003, the city saw a 14% increase in health. Dental was 5.33% <br />• In 2002, the city saw a 13% increase in health. Dental was minimal that year. <br />• The majority of compensation increases for the past three years can be attributed to insurance cost increases. <br />Salary Allocation by Budget Fund: <br />Salaries are allocated by fund, depending on the primary task of that employee and how it relates to that budget <br />function. From time to time, staff reallocates some employee compensation to better reflect that employee's <br />primary work duties. One example is in the sanitary sewer fund. In the past, we did not utilize that fund for <br />very much employee compensation; however, this year, we re-allocated a larger portion of Dave and Colin's <br />time to that fund, because they both perform several duties related to the maintenance of the sewers. <br />Salary Increases: <br />Our general policy is a mix of merit increases and step increases. Typically, we give a 2% to 3% increase to <br />those employees who meet expectations each year in January. Last year, we gave only 2%. This year, I am <br />recommending that we give 3%, based on the excellent performance of all staff, and also to maintain our <br />competitive edge over other cities in the metro. <br />When I was hired in 2000, I implemented a review of all employee compensation, and recommended <br />adjustments to several positions based on my research of comparison cities. At that time, we were facing the <br />• loss of two key staff, and I knew that the replacement of those positions would be much more costly to the city <br />because of market forces, than a modest increase for those employees to entice them to stay on with us. Since <br />then, it has been my aim to try to bring the employees up to a more fair compensation level compared to other <br />cities in the Group 7 category of the Stanton Survey. While we are still in the lowest third of most categories, I <br />believe that we have made great strides in compensating our employees. Because we are such a small city, we <br />ask our employees to be excellent generalists in many different areas, and this requires a higher skill-set. <br />Through my involvement in various professional groups, and at Hamline University, I have been able to talk to <br />my colleagues about staffing patterns, and my current staff. I am proud to tell you that our employees are the <br />envy of the metro, and we are held up as a good example of a city that performs at a very high standard with <br />minimal resources. Our people are our best and most important asset. <br />Collective Barsainin~: <br />The city has no collective bargaining units currently. This allows us to manage our compensation structure <br />more conservatively, and saves time in the management of personnel. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.