My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda_03Dec10
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda Packets
>
200x
>
2003
>
CCAgenda_03Dec10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2009 8:40:24 AM
Creation date
6/26/2009 8:19:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
all of the member cities, add up all of those remainders, and then calculate your city's remainder <br />as a percentage of that total. Your city receives that percentage of the $9 million total that's <br />available this year. This is the same formula we've used for many years. <br />What's behind this year's dividend? <br />Several factors were involved in producing the funds that are available to be returned this year: <br />• As has been the case for the past several underwriting years, municipal liability and auto <br />liability losses have been less than the projected losses which the premium rates for those <br />years were designed to fund. We did, however, have an unusual string of large property <br />losses this year. <br />• There's a "safety margin":built into the LMCIT premium rates,.to cover the risk that losses <br />might turn out to be greater than projected. When losses are less than projected, that margin <br />isn't needed and can be returned as a dividend. <br />• Earned premiums have been more than what we'd projected due to several factors: new <br />members joining the program, existing. members deciding to add optional. coverages, and <br />continued growth in cities' exposures. <br />• LMCIT's fixed-income investments have gained in value somewhat as market rates have <br />declined, so we've realized some capital gains on investments. • <br />One word of caution -while the liability picture overall is good, an ongoing area of concern is <br />the cost of litigation relating to land use regulation and development. Those litigation costs <br />make up a significant part of the total municipal liability cost, and they've been quite volatile <br />from year to year. <br />Should we expect similar dividends in the future? <br />For several years, we've been moving in the direction of strengthening LMCIT's financial <br />reserves and fund balances, and at the same time reducing somewhat the size of the "safety <br />margin" that's built into the.rates. If losses turn out to be at or below what we projected when <br />we set the rates, that "safety margin" is where the surplus funds for dividends come from. <br />Another factor to be aware of is reinsurance. While it maybe loosening a bit, the reinsurance <br />market is currently more difficult than it's been for many years. One result of the current <br />reinsurance market is that our costs have increased significantly, especially for property risks. <br />It might in the future make economic sense for LMCIT to retain more risk rather than to reinsure <br />it. To do so, we'll need to have a strong fund balance to support that retained risk. Again this <br />year, the LMCIT Board further strengthened LMCIT's financial reserves so that we'd be able to <br />handle increased risk if necessary, but it's possible we'd need to strengthen them even further in <br />the future. That could mean retaining some funds that could otherwise be available to be <br />returned as dividends. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.