My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda_03Jul9
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda Packets
>
200x
>
2003
>
CCAgenda_03Jul9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2009 8:57:34 AM
Creation date
6/26/2009 8:32:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Changes Also For Lobbyists <br />Because we have professional government relations people <br />from all over the state and around the country, we don't <br />want to overlook changes in Minnesota state laws that ap- <br />ply to them specifically. By the time lawmakers headed <br />home in late May, they had made the following. changes: <br />Principals (see definition in state statute, but it generally <br />means a lobbyist's clients) must pay a new $50 fee to the <br />Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board (CFPB) on <br />or before March 15~' of each year; lobbyists must register <br />with the CFPB within 5 days of being retained by a client; <br />the number of reports required of lobbyists has been re- <br />duced from three to two by January 15 and June 15; lob- <br />byists who were registered with the CFPB on January 15, <br />Will Locals Take a Pounding? <br />There is no definable research that suggests that at the lo- <br />cal level in Minnesota most elected officials are Republi- <br />can. All we've been able to gather during the past two weeks <br />as we called around is anecdotal indications that seem to <br />support that idea. If Republicans are, as we think, largely <br />in control of municipal, township and county government <br />in Minnesota, it's going to be interesting to see if the high- <br />flying Taxpayers League of Minnesota attacks them with as <br />much vigor as it did DFL proposals for increased taxes <br />during the recently-completed legislative session. The key, <br />of course, is whether local governments-especially cities, <br />towns and counties-will attempt to raise local property <br />taxes to make up for revenue losses from cutbacks in local <br />government aid. The same thing is true for local boards of <br />education. Will they attempt, at least in this first year of <br />the new biennium, to raise taxes to make up for the monies <br />they sought and didn't get during the legislative session. <br />From everything we've learned from Taxpayers League fn- <br />2003, must pay a $50 fee, by August 15, 2003, for each <br />client they represented on that date; the definition of a lob- <br />byist has been amended to require the registration and re- <br />porting of all clients if a lobbyist is paid more than $3,000 <br />per year by a client. The Legislature also directed the CFPB <br />to devise a new and equitable fee schedule to cover lobby- <br />ists, political action committees (PACs) and political party <br />units. The fees will have to be set high enough to recover <br />the CFPB costs of regtitlating elections and election-related <br />issues. That fee schedule must be done by mid-January of <br />next year as a recommendation to the 2004 Legislature to <br />be included in state law <br />siders, the organization is already gearing up a publicity <br />broadside against those local governments that attempt to <br />raise local property taxes following the successful "no new <br />taxes" legislative session. Whether the League has the re- <br />sources to purchase local radio, television and newspaper <br />advertising to raise the awareness of the local voters as to <br />pending action by their elected officials is, as yet, undeter- <br />mined. One thing we think you can count on: The Taxpay- <br />ers League has one of the best intelligence operations work- <br />ing in the state. The organization has supporters ready <br />and willing to report back to League headquarters in the <br />Twin Cities even the slightest suggestion that a property tax <br />increase is under consideration. This includes local levy <br />referendums to increase K 12 funding through the local <br />property tax. Unlike other years, when there was little to <br />enliven the political scene in anon-election year, this might <br />prove to be the most interesting summer and fall ever in <br />rural Minnesota politics. <br />Truth continued from page 1 <br />Probably not. Bush has a little more risk, simply because <br />not finding WMD's is so embarrassing and wlll be brought <br />up again and again. But if the economy improves a bit, or <br />we're at war with someone else, he'll be just fine in his re- <br />election effort. <br />For Pawlenty it's not going to be a question of whether or <br />not he told the truth about shrinking government, it wlll <br />be, rather, whether people think he went too far or just <br />about right in the cuts he made. In truth this budget won't <br />matter all that much should Pawlenty decide to run for <br />reelection. By that time there will be a whole new set of <br />issues on the table. Nonetheless at least one of your edi- <br />tors finds it disturbing that we're beginning to act locally <br />like they do in Washington. Our long memory about Minne- <br />sota says that most of the time our pols were basically truth- <br />tellers; sometimes exaggerators to be sure, but truth-tell- <br />ers nonetheless. This new approximation of what consti- <br />tutes the truth stands the chance of being quite disturbing. <br />Volume 21, Number 20 July 3, 2003 <br />page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.