My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda_03Jun11
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda Packets
>
200x
>
2003
>
CCAgenda_03Jun11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2009 8:57:59 AM
Creation date
6/26/2009 10:14:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Owner of Embers business says landlord has assured him he has no firm offer and intends Embers to <br />continue. <br />• Resident has concerns about drive-through at night, lights. Embers is good at night because "nothing <br />is going on." Chose FH because of friendly, small-town feel; traffic increase will give second <br />thoughts. Dino's can control speaker volume but not customer behavior. Has contacted realtor to ask <br />about impact on property values. Realtor's response was, "You absolutely don't want adrive- <br />through." <br />• George Sherman: Reality is that a restaurant will probably be there; economics require adrive- <br />through. The variances are reasonable. Setback is consistent with other buildings and will be 50-60 <br />feet back if Snelling easement is acquired. Landscaping would be more than existing and reasonable <br />considering other constraints. He confirmed purchase agreement has been signed, earnest money <br />paid. <br />• Resident said she didn't like underlying threat of something else coming into neighborhood if Dino's <br />doesn't. <br />• Resident suggested "destruction of neighborhood" more expensive proposition. Young children most <br />affected by lower amount of landscaping, increased traffic. Named individual little children in <br />neighborhood who will be subjected to hardship. <br />• Why was 25% landscaping required? Must be for. good reason. "Don't pave paradise." <br />• ? (to be added from review of video) <br />• Jason Adamidis for Dino's: Outlined improvements to fence, screening. Gave family point of view <br />on desire to stay in FH, own land under their business, need for drive-through to justify large <br />investment. <br />• Clark Wicklund, Alliant Engineering: Designers exhaustively explored other options for positioning <br />of building and drive-through on site. This configuration accomplishes many things for both Falcon <br />Crossing mall and Dino's. <br />• Embers employee cites a lot of feedback from Embers customers, thinks land [ownership] issue has <br />not been discussed. <br />• Resident: Could drive-through be open only for lunch? Jason: Too confusing to customers; they <br />would keep their current hours (Mon. -Thurs. 10 - 10, Fri. -Sat. 10 to 11, Sunday 10 to 9). <br />• Jason A: Dino's and Sherman have been working on this for about a year. <br />• Lageson to City Attorney: What happens to variances if land purchase does not happen? Answer: <br />Variances only apply if purchase goes through. <br />• Harris: If Dino's is not approved, does it stop SE Corner? Worthington: Not necessarily. <br />• Lukerman: Is it within purview of City to set hours of operation? Worthington: No. <br />• Ryan: Can variance be passed with conditions? City Attorney: Cannot impose conditions without <br />some nexus between the conditions and the variance. [Note: the drive through as designed is code- <br />compliant.] <br />• Harris: Can variances be voted on separately? Answer: Yes. <br />• Resident: Why are we talking about variances when land has not changed hands? Worthington: City <br />has an understanding that a purchase agreement is in effect. <br />Hearing closed. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Motion (Lukermann/? to be added from review of video) to recommend approval of variance <br />on front setback. <br />Discussion. <br />• Action: Motion carried. <br />Multifamily Development Agreement <br />June 6, 2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.