Laserfiche WebLink
__ <br />a <br />:~-~~ ~ducati~n <br />__ <br />Key Elements of the Budget Recommendations <br />The Governor's FY 04-05 budget places a priority on protecting Minnesota's school classrooms from the <br />impact of the state's massive budget shortfall while also avoiding increases in additional property taxes, <br />unless they are truly at local option. This budget proposal fulfills both goals: revenues per student are <br />maintained at the current year level, and the proposed budget for K-12 has no net impact on the <br />statewide level of property taxes. <br />In addition, the Governor's budget recommendations implement several measures to increase <br />accountability and strengthen incentives for cost effective operations, and are a first step toward reform of <br />the general education program. Because of the magnitude of the funding changes resulting from these <br />recommendations, the Governor's budget includes a "hold-harmless" provision that will mitigate the short- <br />term impact on school districts. <br />During 2003, the Governor also plans to continue examining the school finance system, to better link <br />achievement, accountability, and financing. A school finance reform plan will be presented to the <br />Legislature in 2004. <br />Key elements of the E-12 budget proposal include: <br />• The Governor's budget caps teaming year pupil units at 1.0. The Learning Year program began <br />as a pilot program in the late 1980s to allow secondary students to accelerate their learning and <br />graduate early. Use of it has expanded to include elementary as well as secondary students, and <br />to include remedial programs as well as accelerated learning. This program provides school. <br />districts with little incentive to improve performance within the regular school day. <br />• Under the current formula for Limited English Proficiency (LEP) funding, districts lack the <br />incentive to ensure that LEP students are teaming the language skills they need to be successful. <br />The longer a student remains in LEP status, the more aid the district receives. The Governor's <br />budget limits LEP funding for each student to five years. <br />• The Governor's plan seeks to improve the fairness of school financing by substantially increasing <br />the fully equalized portion of referendum revenue and by requiring a local contribution for districts <br />accessing equity revenue. <br />• The Governor recommends eliminating the impact of the $415 roll-in on revenues linked to the <br />general education formula allowance. Certain education formulas, such as compensatory, <br />transportation, transportation sparsity and post secondary enrollment options (PSEO) are linked <br />to the general education formula. When the formula allowance was increased by $415 in FY <br />2003 to reflect the roll-in of referendum revenue, the funding generated by these other formulas <br />automatically increased because of the link to general education funding. The Governor' s <br />budget eliminates the additional 9.9 percent increase caused by this relationship between the <br />formulas. <br />• The Governor proposes a new'"transition revenue" to ensure that districts will not be unduly <br />harmed by the above changes to the general education program. This revenue provides a <br />guarantee that in FY 2004, each district will receive either the amount they received per pupil in <br />FY 2003, or the amount they would have received under current law for FY 2004. <br />• The Governor eliminates statutory growth factors in Special Education, Special Education Excess <br />Cost and Adult Basic Education. Removing these "automatic" increases ensures that decisions <br />will be made each biennial budget, rather than giving some programs a virtual guarantee of <br />increased funding. <br />Governor's 2004-05 Budget <br />