Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FALCON HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING -3- <br />March 12, 2003 <br />Approval of the Memorandum of Agreement with the Capitol Region Watershed District <br />(continued) <br />Lamb moved approval of the Memorandum of Agreement with the Capitol Region <br />Watershed District and authorization for the Mayor and City Administrator to sign the <br />agreement on behalf of the City of Falcon Heights. The motion was unanimously <br />approved. <br />Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 5 of the Falcon Heights City Code <br />Concerning the Indoor Display of Fireworks and Use of Pyrotechnic Equipment and <br />Materials <br />Administrator Worthington said that because of the recent nightclub fire in Rhode Island, <br />staff asked the city attorney, Roger Knutson, to draft an ordinance that would address the <br />issue of pyrotechnic use in unsprinklered buildings. Current State fire codes require the <br />issuance of a permit by the Fire Chief of the city in these cases; however, this may not be <br />adequate due to the burden of proof being on the business owner, and not on the city. In <br />order to ensure that the city has adequate safeguards in place, it is prudent to have an <br />ordinance that specifically disallows the use of pyrotechnics or indoor fireworks in <br />buildings that are not equipped with an automatic fire suppression system. The State <br />Legislature is considering legislation that would ban the display of indoor fireworks or <br />other pyrotechnics. The status of this bill is unclear at the moment, and it may be <br />advisable for the city to act independently in order to ensure that this potential problem is <br />addressed now, rather than later in the year. This ordinance does not address the use <br />of outdoor fireworks, which are already regulated by State law. This ordinance would <br />not impact too many businesses in Falcon Heights. Consultations were held with Tom <br />Brace, the State Fire Marshal, the City's Building Official/Fire Inspector, and the City's <br />Fire Chief. All three think it is a good idea to bring this forward at this time. <br />Council member Lindstrom said that initially he wanted to wait until the Legislature <br />completes its work in this area, but he is open to moving forward on this tonight and <br />revisiting it again, if necessary, after the Legislature is done. He reviewed the <br />proposed ordinance amendment and recommended the following changes: Keep <br />Subsection E. 1-Indoor use limited, but change the last sentence of that section <br />to read: as defined by State law; eliminate Subsection E. 2-Definition; eliminate <br />Subsection E. 3-Permit Required; and eliminate Subsection E. 4-Permit Fee. Current <br />State law says that a person has to get a permit. There is a lot of discretion as to whether <br />the Fire Chief will recommend granting a permit or not. State law gives a lot of <br />• discretion on what to do. This would eliminate discretion. This is more restrictive than <br />current State law. <br />