CCAgenda_05Oct12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

POLICY H2 • 10/12/05 Additional notes: • The existing building is nonconforming with respect to setback on the west side, but no change is proposed on that side and no variance is requested on that side. • The applicant is not applying for rezoning of the 50 foot parcel or lot combination of the two parcels at this time. Analysis• a. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare. Staff finds that granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare. b. That the granting of the variance will not substantially diminish or impair property values or improvements in the area. Staff finds that granting the variance will not substantially diminish or impair property values or improvements in the area. c. That the granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of • substantial property rights. Staff finds that granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. It is reasonable and desirable for a business to have a main entrance that is both welcoming and attractive to the community and accessible to customers and employees. d. That the variances will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. Staff finds that the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties. e. That the variance will not impair the orderly use of the public streets; Staff finds that the variance will not impair the orderly use of public streets. f. That the variance(s) will not increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety; Staff finds that the variance will not increase the danger of fire or endanger the public. safety.