My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda_05Oct12
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda Packets
>
200x
>
2005
>
CCAgenda_05Oct12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2009 10:15:27 AM
Creation date
7/6/2009 2:56:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks and Public Works Director Hoag explained the background of the agreement by talking <br />• about the previous agreement and the EVP (Emergency Vehicle Preemption, or opticom). An <br />EVP (or opticom) is the device that receives signals from emergency vehicles that control the <br />white lights on stoplights, which in turn control traffic when emergency vehicles come through <br />intersections. Hoag explained the cost spread between the three parties with Falcon Heights <br />responsible for the electric costs only and holding no semaphore maintenance responsibility. <br />Hoag told the council that Roseville's cost will be roughly $360 more per year as compared to <br />Falcon Heights estimated costs. Ramsey County is no longer a part of the agreement as they <br />have turned-back Roselawn to the cities, however MnDOT is still a party to this agreement. <br />Councilmember Kuettel reiterated the agreement by stating that Falcon Heights will handle the <br />electricity costs, while Roseville will handle the maintenance. She also explained the logic <br />behind this agreement because of Roseville's access to a boom truck, which would give them the <br />ability to reach the signals. If this were Falcon Heights responsibility, the City would have to <br />rent this type of vehicle. <br /> <br />Hoag added that the proposed $1000 per year for the electric costs is a high estimate according to <br />Xcel. Ramsey County told Hoag that historically LED lights, which were installed for greens <br />and reds throughout the city, have cost them about $50 per month, so the new technology is a <br />cost savings. <br />Councilmember Lindstrom added that an EVP would be beneficial on the Roselawn semaphore, <br />and asked how to make it happen. Hoag explained that he had been in contact with the state <br />• about adding an EVP on the semaphore at Roselawn, however the state told him that they will <br />not install one there for their use since they don't have the need to use them. EVP's are cities' <br />responsibility to install. Councilmember Lindstrom asked that staff research this, while Mayor <br />Gehrz proposed a partnership with Roseville for installation of an EVP in the future. <br />Councilmember Talbot asked Hoag to comment on any foreseen conflict with the other parties in <br />the agreement. Hoag answered that people still think it is a county road, and when they do <br />contact the county, the county is very good about communicating to the cities. <br />Councilmember Talbot then asked whether or not the city has existing lights that could be <br />transferred over to LED lights. Hoag responded that everything Xcel has offered for rebates the <br />city has converted, however many of the yellow lights are not converted yet, simply because of <br />the short time span they are lit. The City will replace them with LED lights as they burn out, but <br />is not making it a point to change them over to LED presently. <br />Councilmember Kuettel moved adoption of Resolution 2005-13, Resolution Adopting Traffic <br />Signal Maintenance Agreement between the City of Falcon Heights, City of Roseville, and State <br />of Minnesota (MNDOT). <br />Councilmember Lindstrom then reminded the council that staff will do more research on the <br />Opticom at Roselawn and Snelling, but did not wish to add that provision to the resolution. <br />Resolution 2005-13 passed unanimously. <br />Councilmember Kuettel then asked if Roseville passed this resolution, and Hoag answered the <br />Council did pass it 5-0 on their 9/26/05 meeting. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.