Laserfiche WebLink
With the General Fund being most important, comparisons of actual to budgeted amounts <br />• for both revenue and expenditures shows that we are very close to budget with both the <br />revenue and expenditures as in the last four years. <br />Comparing the percentage of revenue received to budgeted amounts for the last 5 years: <br />2005 Yearly budgeted amount: $1,580,237 <br /> First 6 months: 640,879 <br /> Percent of budgeted amt: 40.5% <br />2004 Yearly budgeted amount: $1,429,919 <br /> First 6 months: 502,278 <br /> Percent of budgeted amt: 35.1 <br />2003 Yearly budgeted amount: $1,383,971 2003 was the first <br /> First 6 months: 478,510 year that the city <br /> Percent of budgeted amt: 34.6 % received prepayments <br /> of property taxes. <br />2002 Yearly budgeted amount: $1,356,780 <br /> First 6 months: 145,951 <br /> Percent of budgeted amount: 10.8% <br />• 2001 Yearly budgeted amount $1,317,349 <br /> First 6 months: 124,735 <br /> Percent of budgeted amount: 9.5 <br />Comparing the percentage of expenses paid to the budgeted amounts for the last 5 years: <br />2005 Yearly budgeted amount: $1,635,238 <br />First 6 months: 796,747 <br />Percent of budgeted amt: 48.7% <br />2004 Yearly budgeted amount: $1,429,919 <br />First 6 months: 799,122 <br />Percent of budgeted amount: 55.8% <br />* <br />For 2004, the percentage of budget was higher than usual because of several factors: <br />increased diseased tree removal costs, sick leave payouts for employees leaving first half <br />of year, tree pruning usually done in the last months of the year has now been scheduled <br />• to be done during January and February, and the building inspection fees from SE Corner <br />