Laserfiche WebLink
GIVE UP <br />4BIG LAWNS <br />ONE USEFUL WAY TO DEFINE A SUBURB <br />Is "a place that grows lawns." The great <br />postwar disillusionment began for <br />many Americans when they left the city in <br />search of a simpler life and discovered that <br />watering, fertilizing, weeding and mowing <br />the measliest yard takes more time over a <br />year than the average New Yorker spends <br />looking for parking. And the expanses o£ <br />front lawn themselves serve no purpose but <br />their owners' vanity-except that most sub- <br />urban communities require them, on the <br />theory that large setbacks help preserve the <br />bucolic character of a community. <br />'t'hat may have been true in the 192Us, <br />when suburbs were being settled ;3U houses <br />at a time. But when highways opened up <br />huge areas of countryside after the waz, <br />large-lot zoning had the opposite effect: by <br />spreading population over a larger azea, it <br />accelerated sprawl. Ifzoningboards weren't <br />so fearful of "density," they could require <br />developers to cluster houses and set aside <br />land nearby for open space and recreation. <br />This is also a more efficient way to build a <br />community. Houses that are 100 feet apart, <br />obviously, have 100 feet of unused road and <br />utility lines between them. School buses <br />have that much farther to travel. <br />I And the goal of making a walkable com- <br />munity is defeated when houses are spread <br />out on huge lots. Even the depth of the front <br />yard turns out to make a crucial psychologi- <br />cal difference. When houses aze set back <br />behind 30 feet of lawn, the streetscape be- <br />comes oppressively desolate; your perspec- <br />tive changes so slowly you don't feel you're <br />reaching a destination. Probably no single <br />change would improve the quality of subur- <br />ban life as much as shrinking the size of <br />lots-and it would actually make houses <br />cheaper. <br />BRING BACK THE <br />CORNER STORE <br /> <br />11 ;~ <br />c ~~~ _ _ <br />fr-"~- <br />~- ~~~ <br />_ _~ <br />-a- <br />;.~~' <br />louh nun~x~e <br />This wide street in Temecula, Calif., is flne for cars but not for kids and other pedestrians <br />MAKE THE STREETS SKINNY <br />Modern subdivisions are designed to be driven, not <br />walked. Even little-used streets are 36 feet or 40 feet <br />wide, with big sweeping curves at the corners. It's great <br />for cars: traffic barely needs to slow down. But for those <br />on foot, the distance is daunting. Narrow streets - as <br />tittle as 26 feet wide - and tight, right-angled corners are <br />a lot easier for walkers, and probably safer as well, <br />THE SUBURBAN CONDITION, SAYS because they force drivers to slow down. One objection: <br />architect Peter Calthorpe, "is a land- fire departments worry about getting trucks through. <br />scape of absolute segregation ... not ., <br />just in terms of income, age or ethnicity, but But that hasn't been a big problem in old nabes in eitie s <br />simple fUrlctional uses." This is so obvious like New York and Boston. <br />that most people no longer see the absurdi- <br />ty of making a five-mile round trip for a loaf <br />of bread. That is, as long as they have a car; for anyone not so <br />blessed-children, the elderly or handicapped, people who cant <br />afford a car for every member of the family-it's nuts: <br />Again, this is a function of good intentions undone by the explo- <br />sion of suburbia. What worked in a compact neighborhood in a <br />city=a dry cleaner, a drugstore, a corner grocery-became gro- <br />tesque when blown up a hundredfold and applied to whole coun- <br />ties. Shopping strips stretched for dozens of miles along the <br />highways, while the curving streets of suburbia wormed their way <br />ever deeper into the countryside. <br />Obviously, malls and supermarkets, with their vast selections <br />and economies of scale, will never be supplanted by neighborhood <br />shopping streets and corner groceries. But it still should be possible <br />to provide some of the necessities of life within walking distance of <br />many people. Then you could send your kid out for that bread-and <br />a newspaper while he's at it. <br />MAY ]5, tggg NEWSWEEK 47 <br />