My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_95Sep25
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
199x
>
1995
>
PCAgenda_95Sep25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2009 8:33:50 AM
Creation date
7/6/2009 4:08:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Agenda Item 6 <br />• City of Falcon Heights <br />Planning Commission <br />September 25, 1995 <br />ITEM: Request for a variance to Chapter 9 § 13.04 Subd. 6(a) of the <br />zoning code to permit two access drives to the property at 1386 <br />Idaho Avenue <br />SUBMITTED BY: Mr. Michael Zalk, property owner <br />Ms. Sissel Ilstad, property owner <br />REVIEWED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Administrator <br />Carla Aselson, Planner <br />STAFF REPORT: <br />Request. Mr. Zalk is requesting a variance to Chapter 9 § 13.04 Subd. 6(a) of the <br />zoning code to permit two access drives to the double, tandem garage that he <br />proposes to build on his property to replace the existing single car garage. No other <br />variances are required for the construction of the proposed garage, which will be three <br />feet from the sidelot line, because the existing garage is currently located at the three <br />• foot setback. <br />Proposal. Mr. Zalk wants to replace an existing garage with a tandem, double garage <br />(cars end to end -rather than side by side). He wishes to provide access to the <br />garage from the existing front driveway as well as to create access from the rear alley <br />with a six foot drive. This would create the most efficient ingress and egress of the <br />two cars to the proposed garage because both would have immediate driveway <br />access. <br />Proposal's conformity to the existing code As Mr. Zalk points out in his letter, a <br />tandem garage will maintain the open space and an existing tree in his rear yard <br />whereas a standard double garage would not. The proposal for the tandem garage <br />already conforms to the zoning code and can be constructed without a variance. <br />However, Mr. Zalk wishes to have independent access for two cars to the garage. <br />This requires two entrances to the garage and, therefore, he is requesting the variance <br />to the zoning code. <br />In sum, the variance is being requested to maximize the access to the proposed <br />garage for two vehicles. <br />Question before the commission The commission must ask if there is a unique <br />characteristic with this property that creates a hardship and justifies granting a <br />• variance so the property owner can enjoy his full property rights. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.