My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_95Sep25
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
199x
>
1995
>
PCAgenda_95Sep25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2009 8:33:50 AM
Creation date
7/6/2009 4:08:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
existing detached garage entirely in the rear yard with access from the <br />street rather than alley access. <br />b. The property is unique because it has the opportunity to utilize rear alley <br />access to a rear yard accessory structure, which is what the alley is <br />designed for. <br />c. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the zoning code because it <br />maximizes greenspace in the property's rear yard and protects the <br />property's current configuration of open space and vegetation. <br />d. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the original neighborhood <br />design by utilizing alley access to a detached accessory structure in the <br />rear yard with a driveway of no more than 6 feet in length, which is <br />similar to the length of other driveways off alleys throughout the <br />Northome neighborhood. <br />Staff recommendation. After careful analysis, staff recommends that the variance be <br />granted for the reasons explained under alternative number two above. <br />It is important to note that the staff would not recommend granting this variance <br />• based entirely on ease of access to a tandem garage. Staff would also be unlikely to <br />recommend granting a variance for adding street access when alley access already <br />existed because alley access should be encouraged in the neighborhood. Nor is it <br />likely that staff would recommend approving a variance if the request came for an <br />access from the alley to an attached garage that had street access and required more <br />than a six foot drive from the alley to the new garage because this would create two <br />long driveways on the property and be inconsistent with the neighborhood unless <br />conditions were very unique. <br />Conditions. <br />Staff also recommends that the variance be conditioned upon the following: <br />1) The garage remaining in the rear 46 feet (38%) of the property and in its <br />proposed configuration. <br />2) The driveway to the street must be removed if there is no longer direct access <br />from the street into the garage. <br />ATTACHMENTS: <br />1. Site plan for 1386 Idaho <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.