My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_95Sep25
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
199x
>
1995
>
PCAgenda_95Sep25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2009 8:33:50 AM
Creation date
7/6/2009 4:08:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Planning Commission Meeting <br />6/26/95 <br />Page 3 <br />7% expressed a disinterest in permit parking <br />2% (1 owner) was neutral. <br />30% did not respond to the notice or did not sign the petition. <br />The commission discussed alternatives available for residential permit parking which <br />included: <br />- posting the two areas within the street length that petitioned for permit parking; <br />- posting the entire westside of the street and the eastside of Tatum north of 1844 <br />Tatum Street and south of 1794 Tatum Street; <br />- posting both sides of the street, north of 1728 and 1733; <br />- post both sides of the entire street where 2 hour parking is posted. <br />Chairperson Barry opened the public hearing at 7:40. <br />Rick Elm, property owner, said that a majority of property owners have demonstrated <br />• both a need and an interest in permit parking along the entire street and he respectfully <br />requested the commission make a recommendation for this to be done. There being no <br />one else wishing to be heard, the public hearing closed at 7:45. <br />Treadwell moved to recommend to the city council that Tatum Street be designated for <br />residential permit parking and to adopt the resolution approving the request for <br />residential permit parking. <br />Seconded by Hanschen and unanimously approved. <br />REQUEST FOR VARIANCE OF TWO FEET FROM THE REQUIRED FIVE FOOT SIDE <br />YARD SETBACK FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DECK FOR 1865 N HAMLINE <br />AVENUE, CHAPTER 9-2.05 SUBD.2(a) <br />Planner Asleson reported that Mr. Keith Mays, 1865 N. Hamline Avenue,is requesting a <br />variance to construct a deck at a setback of three feet rather than the minimum of five <br />feet from the interior side lot line. Chapter 9-2.05 subd.2(a) of the zoning code requires <br />that decks be constructed at a setback of five feet from interior side and rear lot lines. <br />The street setback minimum on corner lots is 20% of the lot width. She said these <br />setback requirements are necessary to keep decks from being constructed too close to <br />neighboring properties. <br />• The Mays' property is located at the corner of Hamline and Ruggles Avenues. Asleson <br />said that while the address is Hamline Avenue, the actual front entrance is located on <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.